IPDebrief

218.149.228.145

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 218.149.228.145

Date: 2026-06-15

**Key Findings**

1. Risk Profile:

- Reputation: High Risk (80/100) | Provider Score: 0 | Authority Score: 0 | Stability Score: 0

- Threat Indicators: No direct malicious activity detected (no malware, phishing, or C2 indicators).

- Network Role: Mobile IP (KT Corporation, LTE/5G) | Subnet: 218.149.228.0/24 | Abuse Density: 54.8% (17/31 neighbors flagged as high risk).

2. Geolocation:

- Location: Gumi, South Korea (KR) | Coordinates: 35.91° N, 127.77° E | Timezone: Asia/Seoul.

- Mobile Carrier: KT Corporation (MCC 450, MNC 08).

3. Network & Services:

- Open Ports: HTTP (80), HTTPS (443), SSH (22).

- Subnet Neighbors: 31 IPs in 218.149.228.0/24, with 17 high-risk siblings (54.8% abuse density).

- BGP: ASN 4766 (IP Manager) | Route Stability: Unstable (0 route changes in 30 days).

4. Observation History:

- Recent Activity: One observation of "connection_failed" (June 15, 2026).

- Historical Trends: No persistent malicious behavior detected (0 threat persistence days).

5. Relationships:

- Linked Networks: KORNET-KR (same subnet).

- DNS: No PTR records or domain associations.

- Email: No SPF/DKIM/DMArc records.

6. Threat Context:

- Neighbors: 17 high-risk IPs in the subnet (e.g., 218.149.228.134, 218.149.228.135, 218.149.228.146).

- No Campaign Matches: No known malicious campaigns or certificate matches.

**Recommendations**

Actionable Rules:

Next Steps: Cross-reference with threat feeds and analyze neighboring IPs for potential compromise.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡°πŸ‡· South Korea
Region47
CityGumi
TimezoneAsia/Seoul
Latitude35.91
Longitude127.77

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationIP Manager
ASNAS4766
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRAPNIC
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureMobile
Service PurposeWeb Server
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
Mobile

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
80httptcpβ€”
443httpstcpβ€”
22sshtcpβ€”
Closed Ports25, 3389, 8080, 8443 (3 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
35%
24
routing
13%
11
services
28%
23
ownership
27%
23
reputation
26%
13
geolocation
21%
22
Overall25%1016
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Fresh

First Seen2026-05-07 23:04:12 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-26 18:11:08 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-24 15:46:51 UTC
Data FreshnessFresh
Signal Types19
Total Observations20
πŸ” 19 signal types Β· 20 observations collected
This report is generated from 19+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.