Your IP: 216.73.216.123
๐ค Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 218.61.160.74/32
Date: 2026-06-10
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Overall Risk: Moderate (65/100)
- Provider Score: 0 (unassigned)
- Authority Score: 0 (unassigned)
- Stability: Unstable (route changes detected in 30 days)
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no IOCs, spam, or campaigns).
---
**2. Ownership & Network**
- Registrar: China Unicom (ASN 4837, APNIC)
- Network: UNICOM-LN (218.60.0.0/15)
- Geolocation: Shenyang, China (Dadong District, 38 Lianhe Road).
- Mobile Carrier: China Unicom (MCC 460, MNC 01, LTE/5G).
- Subnet: 218.61.160.0/24 (clean, 0% abuse density).
---
**3. Historical Observations**
- Geolocation Validity: Plausible (35.86°N, 104.2°E), but ICMP blocked, limiting validation.
- Network Stability: BGP route instability detected (route changes in 30 days).
- DNSSEC: Validated (no DNSSEC violations).
- Threat Trends: No persistent malicious activity or campaign correlations.
---
**4. Relationships & Neighbors**
- Linked Entities:
- Same network (UNICOM-LN).
- No correlated IPs or certificates.
- Subnet Neighbors: 0 active IPs in 218.61.160.0/24.
---
**5. Actionable Insights**
- Risk Context: Moderate risk likely stems from mobile network infrastructure, not malicious behavior.
- Monitoring Recommendations:
- Track BGP route stability and ICMP validation status.
- Monitor for unexpected DNS or service changes (no open ports detected).
- Mitigation: No immediate action required. Isolate if unusual traffic patterns emerge.
---
Summary: 218.61.160.74 is a legitimate China Unicom mobile IP with no current malicious indicators. Monitor for network stability and unexpected behavior.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
๐ข Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Guangyu Zhan |
| ASN | AS4837 |
| Network Name | UNICOM-LN |
| CIDR Block | 218.60.0.0/15 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | CN |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
๐ DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No โ PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
๐ DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
โ๏ธ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Mobile |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown โ Insufficient routing data to classify |
๐ Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | โ |
| HTTP Title | โ |
๐ TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by โ
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | โ |
| Valid Until | โ |
๐ฏ Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 27% | 2 | 2 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 30% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| geolocation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 20% | 8 | 9 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
๐ Observation Timeline ๐ Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-24 12:34:50 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-10 15:40:31 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-10 16:16:22 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 20 |
| Total Observations | 21 |
๐ 20 signal types ยท 21 observations collected
This report is generated from 20+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
โน๏ธ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.