23.129.64.192
IP Intelligence Briefing: 23.129.64.192
*Generated via IPDebrief tools: Profile, History, Relationships, Neighbors, Actions*
---
**Key Risk Indicators**
- Risk Score: 70/100 (High Risk)
- Network Role: Tor Exit Node (provider: Emerald Onion)
- Geolocation: Registered to Seattle, WA, US, but geo validation flags inconsistency (RTT anomalies suggest potential misregistration).
- Threat Context: No direct malicious indicators (no blacklists, spam, or known campaigns), but elevated risk score due to Tor association.
---
**Ownership & Network**
- AS: AS396507 (Emerald Onion)
- Subnet: 23.129.64.0/24
- Neighbor Analysis:
- Subnet abuse density: 10.4% (moderate).
- 45/96 active neighbors flagged as high/medium risk.
- Siblings include IPs with similar risk profiles (e.g., 23.129.64.99, 23.129.64.130).
---
**Network Activity & Services**
- Open Ports: HTTP (80), HTTPS (443)
- TLS Certificate:
- Issuer: `CN=www.tzu77yrm.com`
- Subject: `CN=www.hvhhic73mo4bhw7wcgcu.net`
- No self-signed or expired certificates detected.
- BGP Context:
- AS Path: `6939 396507`
- Route stability: Stable (no recent changes).
---
**Threat Observations**
- Historical Signals:
- 46 observations over 30 days (last update: 2026-06-13).
- Mixed reputation signals (some DNSBL listings, but no confirmed abuse).
- Temporal Trends: No persistent malicious activity detected.
---
**Recommended Actions**
1. Monitor Traffic:
- Due to Tor exit node association, monitor traffic for unusual patterns (e.g., data exfiltration, C2 attempts).
2. Firewall Rules:
- Block via iptables: `iptables -A INPUT -s 23.129.64.192 -j DROP`
- AWS WAF: Add `23.129.64.192/32` to a custom rule.
3. Investigate Neighbors:
- Review high-risk siblings (e.g., 23.129.64.99) for potential network compromise.
---
**Conclusion**
This IP is part of a Tor exit node network with no direct malicious indicators but elevated risk due to its association with Tor. While it may not be actively malicious, its position in a Tor network could be exploited for anonymity-based attacks. SOC teams should prioritize monitoring and consider blocking based on organizational threat posture.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Emerald Onion |
| ASN | AS396507 |
| Network Name | — |
| CIDR Block | 23.129.64.0/24 |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | — |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Tier 3 — Basic operator with some routing infrastructure |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 46% | 2 | 5 |
| routing | 24% | 2 | 3 |
| services | 34% | 2 | 3 |
| ownership | 36% | 3 | 9 |
| reputation | 20% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 34% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 32% | 12 | 25 |
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) — 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Low (35%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-22 13:35:49 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-26 21:06:52 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-27 16:05:00 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 25 |
| Total Observations | 60 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.