31.57.184.116
IP Intelligence Briefing: 31.57.184.116
Date: 2026-06-18
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Risk Score: 40 (Moderate Risk)
- Ownership: Assigned to ASN 197769 ("Abuse") with no explicit organization name.
- Geolocation:
- Country: United Arab Emirates (AE)
- Region/City: Conflicting data (Illinois, Chicago) vs. UAE coordinates (latitude 23.42, longitude 53.85). Likely geolocation error.
- Threat Indicators: No malicious indicators, blacklists, or campaigns linked.
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, no TLS/HTTP activity).
---
**2. Observation History**
- Latest Observation (June 3, 2026):
- Confidence: 0.21 (low).
- Signal Type 15: Mixed data with 6 dimensions analyzed, but low overall confidence.
- Signal Type 6855: Geolocation inferred as UAE with 0.35 confidence.
- No persistent threats detected over time.
---
**3. Network Relationships**
- Linked Entities:
- Subnet 31.57.184.0/24 classified as "high_abuse" with 8 out of 14 sibling IPs flagged as threats.
- Abuse Density: 57.14% (high risk).
- Inherited Risk: 19 (likely from subnet abuse).
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 31.57.184.116/24
- Neighbor Risk Distribution:
- High Risk: 2 IPs (e.g., 31.57.184.42, 31.57.184.56).
- Medium Risk: 11 IPs (e.g., 31.57.184.20, 31.57.184.104).
- Actionable Insight: The subnet is heavily compromised, suggesting potential lateral movement or shared infrastructure risks.
---
**5. Security Recommendations**
- Firewall Rules (Example):
- iptables: `iptables -A INPUT -s 31.57.184.116 -j DROP`
- nftables: `nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 31.57.184.116 drop`
- Cloudflare WAF: Block IP with rule `{ "action": "block", "expression": "ip.src eq 31.57.184.116" }`.
- Monitoring: Prioritize subnet-level monitoring due to high abuse density.
---
**6. Summary**
- Threat Level: Moderate risk due to subnet abuse and conflicting geolocation data.
- Ownership: Likely malicious (Abuse ASN).
- Action Plan:
1. Block the IP using provided firewall rules.
2. Investigate subnet 31.57.184.0/24 for shared infrastructure risks.
3. Validate geolocation data for accuracy.
Note: No direct malicious activity detected, but the subnet's high abuse density warrants cautious monitoring.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Abuse |
| ASN | AS197769 |
| Network Name | — |
| CIDR Block | — |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | — |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 26% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 24% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 26% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 21% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 20% | 9 | 13 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:04:15 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-23 10:01:35 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-23 10:16:07 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 18 |
| Total Observations | 20 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.