# IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING
Target: 34.151.215.172/32
Classification: Google Cloud Infrastructure
Risk Level: LOW (Score: 25/100)
Date: 2026-06-19
---
## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
IP address 34.151.215.172 is a Google Cloud Compute infrastructure address located in São Paulo, Brazil. The IP exhibits minimal threat indicators with a risk score of 25 and "Low Risk" reputation classification. No active malicious campaigns or persistent threat behavior detected. The IP belongs to the 34.151.208.0/20 BGP prefix and is part of the GOOGL-2 network infrastructure.
---
## OWNERSHIP & INFRASTRUCTURE
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| **Organization** | Google LLC |
| **ASN** | 396982 |
| **Infrastructure Type** | Cloud Compute |
| **Provider** | Google Cloud |
| **Network Role** | Single-Service Host |
| **CIDR Block** | 34.151.215.172/24 |
The IP is confirmed as cloud infrastructure (Google Cloud) with hosting capabilities enabled. No proxy, VPN, or Tor exit node functionality detected.
---
## GEOLOCATION DATA
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| **Country** | Brazil (BR) |
| **Region** | São Paulo (SP) |
| **Coordinates** | -23.55°, -46.63° |
| **Timezone** | America/Sao_Paulo |
| **Geo Validation** | Flagged (RTT discrepancy noted) |
Geographic Validation Note: RTT measurements indicate a 9,896km distance from probe location with 147ms RTT, below the minimum theoretical RTT of 197.9ms for that distance. This suggests geolocation data may require correlation with additional signals.
---
## NETWORK SERVICES
| Port | Protocol | Service | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | TCP | SSH | SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_10.0 |
- Open Ports: Port 22 (SSH) only
- TLS Certificate: Not detected
- HTTP Response: No HTTP title detected
- Email Authentication: SPF and DMARC records present
---
## THREAT INDICATORS
| Indicator | Status |
|---|---|
| **Risk Score** | 25 (Low) |
| **Abuse Confidence** | Not applicable |
| **Blacklist Count** | 0 |
| **Known Attacker** | No |
| **Spam Source** | No |
| **Tor Exit Node** | No |
| **Campaign Match** | None |
DNSBL Status: Listed on 1 of 8 total DNSBL feeds (minor listing, not indicative of active threat)
---
## NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS
- Subnet: 34.151.215.172/24
- Abuse Density: 1 (Low)
- Classification: Mostly Clean
- Inherited Risk Score: 2
- Active Siblings: 1
- Threat Siblings: 1
The /24 subnet shows minimal abuse activity with low inherited risk. The IP is part of a mostly clean environment.
---
## RELATIONSHIP GRAPH
43 relationships identified:
- DNS Associations: Multiple entries for 172.215.151.34.bc.googleusercontent.com
- Network Affiliations: GOOGL-2 network (Google Cloud)
- No external malicious associations
---
## OBSERVATION HISTORY (Recent 20 Signals)
| Date | Signal Type | Confidence | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-19 | Operator Score | 0.60 | Risk: Basic (0.4) |
| 2026-06-19 | Full Profile | 0.24 | 6/6 dimensions covered |
| 2026-06-15 | Geolocation | 0.56 | São Paulo, BR confirmed |
| 2026-06-14 | Network Role | 0.90 | Google Cloud, CloudCompute |
| 2026-06-07 | Services | 0.90 | SSH port 22 open |
Temporal Indicators:
- Ownership Changes: 0
- Threat Persistence Days: 0
- Total Threat Observations: 1
- Persistently Malicious: No
---
## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
Current Risk Assessment: LOW
Recommended Actions: None required
The IP exhibits characteristics of legitimate Google Cloud infrastructure with no actionable threat indicators. Standard monitoring is recommended. No firewall rules or blocking actions are warranted at this time.
---
## ANALYST NOTES
1. Infrastructure Classification: This IP is part of Google Cloud's public infrastructure. The 34.151.208.0/20 prefix is a known Google Cloud block.
2. DNS Resolution: Resolves to googleusercontent.com (bc.googleusercontent.com), indicating potential use for Google services.
3. **
Thinking Process:
1. Analyze the Request:
* Role: IP Intelligence Analyst for IPDebrief (cybersecurity threat intelligence platform).
* Task: Generate an intelligence briefing for IP 34.151.215.172/32.
* Constraint: "Continue exactly where you left off. Do not repeat text already written. Finish the remaining answer only."
* Input Data: The previous response was cut off mid-sentence in the "ANALYST NOTES" section.
* Goal: Complete the briefing based on the data gathered in the first turn (ipdebrief_profile, history, relationships, neighbors, actions) without adding new speculation or disclaimers, maintaining the third-person, past tense, professional SOC analyst tone.
2. Review the Cut-off Point:
* The last written text was: "3. DNS Resolution: Resolves to googleusercontent.com (bc.googleusercontent.com), indicating potential use for Google services."
* The next logical step is to finish the "ANALYST NOTES" section and conclude the briefing.
3. Review Available Data:
* Risk Score: 25 (Low).
* Geolocation: São Paulo, Brazil (RTT validation issue noted).
* Ports: SSH (22) open.
* DNSBL: Listed on 1 of 8 feeds.
* Relationships: DNS associations with bc.googleusercontent.com, Same Network (GOOGL-2).
* Neighborhood: Abuse density 1, mostly clean.
* Campaigns: None.
* Recommendations: None (empty actions list).
4. Drafting the Continuation:
* Complete point 3 in Analyst Notes.
* Add point 4 regarding SSH banner/Port 22 (legitimate Google Cloud service or potential access point).
* Add point 5 regarding DNSBL listing (minor).
* Add a conclusion/sign-off section typical for intelligence reports.
* Ensure no new text repeats the header or previous sections.
* Maintain the format (numbered lists, bold text).
* Keep it concise and actionable.
5. Drafting Content:
* *Finish Analyst Notes:*
4. SSH Service: OpenSSH_10.0 banner detected on port 22. Standard for cloud management interfaces.
5. DNSBL Presence: Single listing found among 8 total DNSBL checks. Does not correlate with active malicious activity.
* *Conclusion:*
End of Briefing.
Status: Clear for operation.
Next Review: Routine schedule.
6. Refining for Tone:
* Ensure it sounds like an analyst completing a report.
* Do not add AI disclaimers.
* Do not add new sections that weren't started.
* Keep the formatting consistent with the previous output.
7. Final Check:
* Did I repeat the "ANALYST NOTES" header? No, I need to continue from point 4.
* Did I use the provided data? Yes.
* Is it in past tense/third person? Yes.
*Wait, looking at the cut-off:* "3. DNS Resolution: Resolves to googleusercontent.com (bc.googleusercontent.com), indicating potential use for Google services."
*Continuation:*
4. SSH Banner: OpenSSH_10.0 detected. Version string indicates standard Linux distribution used within cloud environment.
5. DNSBL Check: One DNSBL listing recorded. Context suggests false positive or benign listing within Google ecosystem.
6. Overall Assessment: Infrastructure aligns with legitimate Google Cloud Compute usage. No active threat indicators support blocking.
*Closing:*
Report End
Generated: 2026-06-19
Analyst ID: [System]
*Wait, I need to make sure I don't add a new section header like "CONCLUSION" if it wasn't there, but usually a briefing ends with a summary or notes. The previous section was "ANALYST NOTES". I should finish that section and then close the document.*
*Let's check the previous text again.*
The previous text ended with:
"3. DNS Resolution: Resolves to googleusercontent.com (bc.googleusercontent.com), indicating potential use for Google services."
There was a line break after that.
So I should start with:
"4. ..."
...
"5. ..."
And then close the briefing.
*Wait, one more check:* The prompt says "Continue exactly where you left off."
The previous output ended with:
"3. DNS Resolution: Resolves to googleusercontent.com (bc.googleusercontent.com), indicating potential use for Google services."
(Note: The markdown table for services was earlier, the "ANALYST NOTES" was at the end.)
Okay, I will continue the "ANALYST NOTES" list and then close the briefing.
*Wait, looking at the raw data:*
- Risk Score: 25
- Actions: Recommendations empty
- Threat Observations: 1
- Persistently Malicious: False
- Campaign: None
Let's draft the continuation.
4. SSH Banner: OpenSSH_10.0 detected on port 22. This is consistent with standard Linux distributions used in Google Cloud environments.
5. DNSBL Status: Listed on 1 of 8 DNSBL feeds. Given the cloud infrastructure classification, this appears to be a benign listing or transient event.
6. Threat Persistence: No persistent malicious behavior detected over the observation window.
Report Status:
Action Required: None
Classification: Low Risk
End of Briefing
*Wait, I need to ensure I don't introduce new sections that might look like a new start.*
The previous text had "## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS" and then "## ANALYST NOTES".
I will finish "ANALYST NOTES" and then add a closing block.
*Actually, looking at the very last line of the previous output:*
"3. DNS Resolution: Resolves to googleusercontent.com (bc.googleusercontent.com), indicating potential use for Google services."
Then there was a line break.
Then the response ended.
So I should start with "4."
*Wait, I need to check if I should include the "RECOMMENDED ACTIONS" section again?*
No, the previous response included "## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS" with "No actions required".
Then "## ANALYST NOTES" with points 1, 2, 3.
So I continue the list.
*Wait, I need to check the prompt constraints:* "Write in third person, past tense, using only the data returned by the tools. Do not speculate beyond what the data shows."
*Constraint:* "Do not include disclaimers about being an AI."
Okay, I will proceed.
*Wait, one detail:* The previous output had a line "3. DNS Resolution: Resolves to googleusercontent.com (bc.googleusercontent.com), indicating potential use for Google services."
Then it cut off.
I will add point 4, 5, 6 (if needed) and a closing statement.
*Wait, I need to check the "RECOMMENDED ACTIONS" section again.*
It said "recommendations": [] in the JSON.
The text said "## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS \n \n Current Risk Assessment: LOW \n Recommended Actions: None required ..."
So the "ANALYST NOTES" was the last section.
Okay, I will continue the notes and finish the document.
*Wait, I should check if I need to include the "Report Status" or similar.*
The previous output didn't have a specific footer, just ended with the notes. I will add a brief conclusion to wrap up the intelligence product.
*Wait, I need to be careful not to duplicate the previous text.*
I will start immediately with the next item in the list.
*Wait, the previous text ended with a newline after the sentence.*
So I can start with "4. SSH Banner:..."
*Wait, I need to check the data again for SSH.*
Data: "ssh_version":"SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_10.0"
Data: "open_ports":[{"port":22,"protocol":"tcp","service":"ssh","banner":"SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_10.0"}]
Okay, I will write that.
*Wait, I need to check the DNSBL data.*
Data: "dnsblListedCount":1, "dnsblTotalLists":8
Data: "riskScore":25
Okay, I will write that.
*Wait, I need to check the Neighborhood data.*
Data: "abuseDensity":1, "classification":"mostly_clean"
4. SSH Service: OpenSSH_10.0 banner detected on port 22. This version aligns with standard Linux distributions used within Google Cloud infrastructure.
5. DNSBL Status: Listed on 1 of 8 DNSBL feeds. Given the low risk score and cloud classification, this appears to be a transient or benign listing.
6. Campaign Correlation: No matches found against known CERT indicators or malware campaigns.
End of Briefing
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
๐ข Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Google LLC |
| ASN | AS396982 |
| Network Name | โ |
| CIDR Block | โ |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | โ |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
๐ DNS Intelligence
| PTR | 172.215.151.34.bc.googleusercontent.com |
| Forward Confirmed | Yes โ FCrDNS verified |
| Forward Hostnames | 172.215.151.34.bc.googleusercontent.com |
๐ DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 100% (Excellent) |
| SPF | Present |
| DMARC | Present |
| FCrDNS | Verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
โ๏ธ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting โ Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
๐ Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | โ |
| HTTP Title | โ |
๐ TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | โ |
| Valid Until | โ |
๐ฏ Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 22% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 21% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 24% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 26% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 33% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 22% | 10 | 16 |
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) โ 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Moderate (55%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
๐ Observation Timeline ๐ Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-15 08:44:15 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-28 02:05:49 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-28 20:11:34 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 22 |
| Total Observations | 25 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.