34.163.92.31📋 Copy

# IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING

Target: 34.163.92.31/32

Date: Current

Classification: Cloud Infrastructure IP (Google Cloud)

Risk Score: 50/100 (Moderate Risk)

---

## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 34.163.92.31 is a Google Cloud infrastructure address within the GOOGL-2 network block (34.128.0.0/10). The IP demonstrates moderate risk scoring (50) despite being part of Google Cloud's public infrastructure. No active malicious campaigns, threat indicators, or blacklist listings detected. The subnet shows clean classification with zero abuse density and no threat siblings.

---

## INFRASTRUCTURE PROFILE

---

## THREAT ASSESSMENT

Threat Indicators: None detected

• No known attacker campaigns
• No spam source classification
• Zero blacklist listings
• Not a Tor exit node
• No active threat feeds

Risk Scoring:

• Overall Risk Score: 50 (Moderate)
• Provider Score: 0
• Authority Score: 0
• Abuse Confidence Score: N/A
• Operator Score: 0.3478 (Basic)

---

## NETWORK BEHAVIOR & SERVICES

• Open Ports: None detected (Firewalled / No Services)
• Services: Not running identifiable services
• Connection Type: Cloud infrastructure endpoint
• Reverse DNS: 31.92.163.34.bc.googleusercontent.com
• Forward DNS: Confirmed (googleusercontent.com)
• TLS/Certificates: None observed

Control Plane Data:

• BGP Prefix: 34.163.64.0/18
• Route Stability: False (not stable)
• DNSSEC Valid: Yes
• DNSBL Listings: 2 of 8 total lists
• RRPI State: Not evaluated

---

## GEOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS

Primary consensus location indicates France (Paris), though historical observations show coordinate variance. Geographic validation shows incomplete data with accuracy radius of 2500km. This variance is typical for cloud infrastructure that may route through multiple edge locations.

Geolocation Confidence: Low to Moderate

Consensus Location: Paris, France

---

## OBSERVATION HISTORY (17 Signals)

Temporal Analysis:

• Most Recent Observation: 2026-08-06
• Ownership Changes: 0 (Stable)
• Threat Observation Count: 0
• Threat Persistence Days: 0
• Persistently Malicious: No

Signal Distribution:

• Ownership signals: Stable, no changes detected
• Neighborhood signals: Clean classification, abuse density 0
• Geolocation signals: Varied confidence levels (0.35-0.85)
• Operator signals: Basic classification (0.3478)

Trend Analysis: No evidence of escalating risk behavior. IP demonstrates stability with no observed threat persistence patterns.

---

## NETWORK RELATIONSHIPS (8 Relations)

• DNS Associations: 31.92.163.34.bc.googleusercontent.com (multiple instances)
• Network Relations: GOOGL-2 (Google Cloud network)
• External Relations: None beyond cloud infrastructure

Correlated Entities: None detected outside of expected Google Cloud infrastructure relationships.

---

## NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS (34.163.92.0/24)

• Subnet Classification: Clean
• Abuse Density: 0 (No abuse)
• Total Siblings: 1 (target IP only)
• Active Siblings: 0
• Threat Siblings: 0
• Risk Distribution: No high, medium, or low risk neighbors detected

The /24 subnet shows no adjacent malicious activity, suggesting isolated risk scoring rather than coordinated abuse.

---

## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Risk-Based Recommendations: Despite being Google Cloud infrastructure, the moderate risk score triggers defensive recommendations:

Firewall Rules Generated:

• iptables: `iptables -A INPUT -s 34.163.92.31 -j DROP`
• nftables: `nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 34.163.92.31 drop`
• nginx: `deny 34.163.92.31;`
• pfSense: `34.163.92.31/32`
• Cloudflare WAF: Block (expression: `ip.src eq 34.163.92.31`)
• AWS WAF: IPSet address 34.163.92.31/32

Contextual Note: Blocking this IP will impact legitimate Google Cloud traffic. Recommended only if the IP is observed in conjunction with other suspicious activity from the same source.

---

## INTELLIGENCE CONCLUSION

IP 34.163.92.31 represents Google Cloud infrastructure with moderate risk scoring. The lack of threat indicators, clean neighborhood classification, and stable ownership suggest this is a legitimate cloud endpoint. The moderate risk score may result from DNSBL listings (2 of 8) or routing instability rather than malicious activity.

Action Priority: LOW

Recommended Monitoring: Continue monitoring for behavioral changes

Blocking Recommended: No, unless contextual threat intelligence indicates abuse

---

*Report generated from IPDebrief intelligence platform data. Recommendations are probabilistic and should be validated with additional threat context before implementation.*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.