Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 36.144.74.29/32
*Generated via IPDebrief Analysis*
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 40 (Moderate Risk)
- Ownership: Registered to haijun li (CMNET, ASN 24547) in Beijing, China.
- Geolocation: Located in Beijing (CN), but coordinates and timezone are unconfirmed.
- Threat Indicators: No detected malware, spam, or attacker associations.
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports or TLS certificates).
---
**2. Observation History**
- DNSSEC: Validated but flagged in 2 DNSBL lists (out of 8 total).
- Routing Stability: BGP route stability score (0.13), indicating potential instability.
- Threat Trends: No persistent malicious activity; last observed risk signal on 2026-06-18.
---
**3. Relationships & Network Context**
- Linked Entities:
- Subnet 36.144.74.0/24 (abuse density: 0.33, classified as "mostly_clean").
- Same ASN (24547) under CMNET.
- Neighbors:
- 36.144.74.33: Risk score 55 (medium).
- 36.144.74.39: Risk score 80 (high).
- Subnet contains 3 IPs, 2 active, 1 flagged as high-risk.
---
**4. Actionable Insights**
- Monitor Subnet: The associated subnet (36.144.74.0/24) has 1 high-risk neighbor and 1 medium-risk IP.
- Verify DNSBL Listings: Investigate why this IP appears in 2 DNSBLs (e.g., false positives or misconfigurations).
- Block High-Risk Neighbors: Consider blocking 36.144.74.39 if it persists as high-risk.
- Check Ownership: Confirm CMNETβs ownership and verify if the IP is part of a legitimate network.
---
Conclusion: This IP is not currently a direct threat but resides in a subnet with mixed risk. Monitor neighbors and validate DNSBL flags to ensure no overlooked risks.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | haijun li |
| ASN | AS24547 |
| Network Name | CMNET |
| CIDR Block | 36.128.0.0/10 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | CN |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 29% | 2 | 2 |
| routing | 17% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 18% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 24% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 17% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 21% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 21% | 10 | 12 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:04:17 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-23 10:59:24 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-23 11:16:11 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 18 |
| Total Observations | 24 |
π 18 signal types Β· 24 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.