Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 4.228.184.113
Date: 2026-06-08
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 25 (Low Risk)
- Ownership: Microsoft Corporation (ASN 8075)
- Geolocation: Brazil (SP, São Paulo), Latitude: -23.55, Longitude: -46.63
- Network Role: Microsoft Azure CloudCompute (Firewalled / No Services)
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no blacklists, campaigns, or abuse reports).
- DNSSEC: Validated, but listed in 1 DNSBL (DNS-Based Blackhole List).
---
**2. Observation History**
- Latest Risk Assessment (2026-06-08): Minimal risk (operator score: 0.13), no active threats.
- Geolocation Validation: ICMP blocked, unable to validate RTT or probe count.
- Subnet Abuse Density: 0.5 (mostly clean, but 1 threat sibling in 4.228.184.28/24 subnet).
---
**3. Relationships**
- Linked Entities:
- Microsoft Azure (MSFT) (same network, 12 relationships).
- No other organizations, hostnames, or certificates associated.
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 4.228.184.113/24
- Neighbor Risk:
- 4.228.184.28: Risk Score 25 (low), Authority Score 50 (moderate).
- Abuse Density: 0.5 (mixed risk, 1 threat sibling in 25 IPs).
---
**5. Actionable Insights**
- Monitor Neighbor 4.228.184.28: Higher risk score despite low overall subnet abuse. Investigate potential lateral movement or shared infrastructure risks.
- Verify DNSSEC Configuration: Ensure Microsoftβs DNSSEC validation is not compromised, given the DNSBL listing.
- Subnet-Level Checks: Review 4.228.184.0/24 for unusual activity, as abuse density suggests potential for future threats.
- Cloud Security: Confirm Azure network policies restrict unauthorized access to this subnet.
---
Conclusion:
This IP is part of Microsoftβs infrastructure and shows no direct malicious activity. However, the subnetβs 1 threat sibling and DNSBL listing warrant closer monitoring. SOC teams should prioritize evaluating the neighboring IP and ensuring cloud network segmentation.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Microsoft Corporation |
| ASN | AS8075 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 31% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 15% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 24% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 31% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 33% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 24% | 10 | 16 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-18 21:28:30 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-28 08:03:46 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-29 02:07:55 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 18 |
| Total Observations | 22 |
π 18 signal types Β· 22 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.