41.81.240.22📋 Copy

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 41.81.240.22

Classification: Moderate Risk • Status: Active • Date: Current

---

## Executive Summary

IP address 41.81.240.22 presents a moderate risk profile (Risk Score: 40) with ambiguous geolocation data and mobile carrier classification. The address exhibits geo-inconsistency between registration and observation data, and is currently blacklisted on 2 of 8 DNSBL feeds. No active threat indicators or known malicious campaigns have been identified. The subnet demonstrates clean abuse density characteristics.

---

## Technical Profile

---

## Geolocation Analysis

Critical Finding: Significant geo-inconsistency observed across data sources:

• Registration Data: AFRINIC registry associates block with Kenya (Nairobi)
• IP Profile Data: Reports United Kingdom (London)
• Mobile Carrier: Safaricom (Kenyan carrier, MCC: 639, MNC: 02)
• Historical Observations: Conflicting signals between KE and GB

This inconsistency suggests either misregistration, routing manipulation, or legitimate roaming behavior. The mobile carrier classification (Safaricom) strongly supports Kenyan origin.

---

## Threat Assessment

Current Risk Indicators:

• DNSBL listings present (2/8 feeds)
• Control plane stability: False (route changes observed)
• No active threat indicators
• No known attacker/spam source classification
• No Tor exit node activity
• No persistent malicious activity detected

Threat Persistence: 0 days • Campaign Correlation: None identified

---

## Neighborhood Analysis

Subnet: 41.81.240.22/24

• Abuse Density: 0 (Clean)
• Active Siblings: 0
• Threat Siblings: 0
• Neighbor Count: 0

The /24 subnet shows minimal risk characteristics with no immediate sibling threats.

---

## Historical Observations

14 signal observations recorded. Recent activity (2026-07-28) confirms:

• ICMP probing: Blocked/Unable to validate
• Ownership changes: 0
• Threat observation count: 0

No trend toward increased risk over observation period.

---

## SOC Recommendations

1. Monitor Geo-Discrepancy: Investigate conflicting geolocation data (KE vs GB) for potential routing anomalies or misconfiguration.

2. DNSBL Review: Evaluate the specific DNSBL feeds listing this IP to determine relevance to your threat context.

3. Mobile Classification: Treat as mobile IP with appropriate mobile network traffic policies.

4. No Immediate Action Required: No active malicious indicators detected. Standard logging and monitoring recommended.

5. Subnet Context: No threat correlation with neighboring IPs in /24 subnet.

---

## Actionable Firewall Rules

No specific blocking recommendations based on current risk profile. Standard logging and rate-limiting for mobile traffic recommended.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.