Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 42.180.249.118
Date: 2026-06-11
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Risk Score: 50 (Moderate Risk)
- Provider: China Unicom (ASN 4837)
- Geolocation: China (P.R. China), Shanghai, 34.77°N, 113.72°E
- Network Role: Mobile LTE/5G network (MCC 460, MNC 01)
- Threat Indicators:
- Listed in 8 DNSBLs (2 high-severity, 6 medium-severity)
- No confirmed malicious activity (no malware, phishing, or C2 indicators)
---
**2. Historical Observations**
- Latest Activity: 2026-06-11
- DNSBL Listings: Detected in 8 lists (e.g., Spamhaus, OpenDNS)
- Operator Score: Minimal risk (0.13)
- Stability: No significant ownership or threat persistence changes
---
**3. Network Relationships**
- Shared Network: UNICOM-LN (China Unicom)
- Subnet: 42.180.249.0/24
- Neighbor Risk:
- 4 IPs in subnet (all low-risk, 0 high-risk)
- Abuse density: 0%
---
**4. Actionable Insights**
- Monitor DNSBL Status: The IP is listed in multiple DNSBLs, suggesting potential spam or malicious activity. Verify with upstream providers.
- Check Mobile Carrier Logs: China Unicomβs LTE/5G network may have traffic patterns indicative of data exfiltration or botnet activity.
- Subnet Analysis: Neighboring IPs are low-risk, but the subnetβs low abuse density may mask hidden threats.
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Block DNSBL Listings: Add to firewall rules (e.g., iptables, Cloudflare WAF) to mitigate spam risks.
- Enhance Mobile Network Monitoring: Collaborate with China Unicom to analyze traffic anomalies on this LTE/5G segment.
- Continuous Monitoring: Track DNS and geolocation changes, as the IPβs risk profile could evolve.
End of Briefing
*Generated by IPDebrief Threat Intelligence Platform*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | IRT-CU-CN |
| ASN | AS4837 |
| Network Name | UNICOM-LN |
| CIDR Block | 42.176.0.0/13 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | CN |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Mobile |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| geolocation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 13% | 6 | 7 |
Coverage: 5/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: partial
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-27 01:07:43 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-11 07:59:25 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-11 08:43:31 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 16 |
| Total Observations | 16 |
π 16 signal types Β· 16 observations collected
This report is generated from 16+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.