43.100.58.135
IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
🤖 Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 43.100.58.135
*Generated via IPDebrief analysis tools*
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 25 (Low Risk)
- Ownership: ASN 45102 (IRT-ASEPL-SG, APNIC)
- Geolocation: Listed as "US" but city is "Hong Kong" (potential discrepancy). Latitude/longitude missing.
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity, no blacklists, no known campaigns.
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, no TLS/HTTP services detected).
---
**2. Observation History**
- Recent Activity (Last 30 Days):
- DNSSEC validation confirmed.
- BGP prefix "43.100.0.0/16" registered to Alibaba (SG).
- 1 DNSBL listing (out of 8 total).
- No scans, enumerations, or WAF violations detected.
- Trend: Stable with no escalation in risk signals.
---
**3. Relationships**
- Network Affiliation: Linked to "ASEPL-SG" subnet (ASN 45102).
- No External Connections: No hostnames, certificates, or organizations tied to this IP.
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 43.100.58.135/24
- Neighbor Count: 0 active IPs in subnet (isolated).
- Abuse Density: 0% (no malicious neighbors).
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Monitor Geolocation Discrepancy: Verify if the "US" country code aligns with the APNIC-registed ASN (Alibaba, Singapore).
- Maintain Current Controls: No immediate action required due to low risk.
- Watch for Subnet Changes: Given the isolated subnet, monitor for unexpected neighbor activity.
---
Source: IPDebrief (2026-06-12)
Note: No evidence of active threats. Continue standard monitoring protocols.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | IRT-ASEPL-SG |
| ASN | AS45102 |
| Network Name | ASEPL-SG |
| CIDR Block | 43.0.0.0/9 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | SG |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Single-Service Host |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | ssh | tcp | |
| Closed Ports | 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (1 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
| SSH Version | SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.6p1 Ubuntu-3ubuntu13.16 |
🔐 TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by —
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| routing | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| services | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| geolocation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 6% | 3 | 4 |
Coverage: 2/6 dimensions · Data sufficiency: partial
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-06-01 11:44:47 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-12 11:44:38 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-12 11:57:12 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 18 |
| Total Observations | 18 |
🔍 18 signal types · 18 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
ℹ️ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata — IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.