Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 43.130.28.8
Date: 2026-06-08
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 15 (Low Risk)
- Ownership: Registered to IRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG (Tencent, Singapore).
- Geolocation: Santa Clara, California, United States (37.35°N, -121.95°W).
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, no TLS/HTTP activity).
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no blacklists, no campaigns, no DNS anomalies).
---
**2. Observation History**
- Stability: No significant changes in risk or network behavior over the past 30 days.
- Geolocation Consistency: Plausible Santa Clara, CA location with minimal RTT variance.
- Network Activity: No DNS enumeration, honeypot hits, or WAF violations recorded.
---
**3. Relationships**
- Linked Entities:
- Subnet 43.130.0.0/18 (Tencent, Singapore).
- No external domains, certificates, or organizations associated.
- Control Plane:
- BGP prefix 43.130.0.0/18 (AS132203, Tencent).
- RPKI valid, no route anomalies.
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 43.130.28.8/24 (2 IPs analyzed).
- Neighbor Risk:
- 43.130.28.157: 25/100 (Low Risk).
- 43.130.28.175: 50/100 (Medium Risk).
- Abuse Density: 0% (low risk of subnet-wide compromise).
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Monitoring: Track neighbors with medium risk (e.g., 43.130.28.175) for potential lateral movement.
- Firewall: Allow minimal traffic to this IP due to its firewalled state; no explicit blocking required.
- Context: Part of Tencentβs infrastructure; no evidence of malicious use.
Conclusion: 43.130.28.8 is a low-risk IP associated with Tencent. No immediate action required, but monitor its subnet for emerging threats.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | IRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG |
| ASN | AS132203 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| routing | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| geolocation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 19% | 7 | 8 |
Coverage: 5/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: partial
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-16 21:00:54 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-08 01:56:35 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-08 01:57:48 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 13 |
| Total Observations | 15 |
π 13 signal types Β· 15 observations collected
This report is generated from 13+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.