Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 43.130.58.135
Date: 2026-05-31
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Overall Risk: Low (Risk Score: 25)
- Provider Risk: Neutral (Score: 0)
- Authority Score: 0 (no centralized control)
- Stability: Unstable (Route stability: False)
---
**2. Ownership & Network**
- ASN: 132203 (IRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG / Tencent)
- CIDR: 43.130.0.0/18
- Geolocation:
- Reported Location: Santa Clara, CA, US (MaxMind)
- Actual Owner: Singapore-based organization (SG)
- Subnet Abuse Density: 0% (low risk in sibling IPs)
---
**3. Threat Indicators**
- No Malicious Activity: No threats, blacklists, or campaigns linked.
- DNS/Email Security: No SPF/DKIM records, no email reputation data.
- Network Behavior: No open ports, TLS certs, or server banners detected.
---
**4. Network Relationships**
- Shared Network: Part of the ACE-SG network (ASN 132203).
- Neighbors:
- 43.130.58.49: High authority score (50), low risk.
- Subnet: 43.130.58.135/24 (1 neighbor active).
---
**5. Temporal Observations**
- First Seen: 2026-05-27 (BGP prefix allocation).
- Last Seen: 2026-05-31 (geolocation and ownership data).
- Threat Persistence: No long-term malicious patterns.
---
**6. Recommendations**
- Monitor Network: Track ACE-SG network for unusual traffic patterns.
- Verify Geolocation: Investigate discrepancy between reported US location and Singapore-based owner.
- Check Neighbor: Monitor 43.130.58.49 for potential entry points.
- DNS Security: Ensure DNSSEC validation and CAA records are enforced.
Conclusion: This IP is low risk but should be monitored within its network context. Verify geolocation anomalies and ensure DNS security practices are in place.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | IRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG |
| ASN | AS132203 |
| Network Name | ACE-SG |
| CIDR Block | 43.130.0.0/18 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | US |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 13% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 20% | 9 | 13 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-16 08:57:10 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-07 21:24:57 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-07 21:34:52 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 20 |
| Total Observations | 21 |
π 20 signal types Β· 21 observations collected
This report is generated from 20+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.