Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 43.159.139.126
Date: 2026-06-08
Threat Assessment:
- Risk Score: 25 (Low Risk)
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no known attackers, spam, or campaigns).
- Network Stability: Firewalled with no open services (ports/tls).
- Geolocation: Santa Clara, CA, US (consistent with Tencent infrastructure).
Ownership & Infrastructure:
- Provider: ASN 132203 (IRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG, Tencent).
- Network Role: Internal infrastructure (no CDN, cloud, or residential indicators).
- Subnet: 43.159.128.0/19 (part of ACE-SG network).
Observation History:
- Recent Activity: Minimal risk signals (0.2174 operator score) with no persistent threats.
- Geolocation Consensus: Confirmed US origin (Santa Clara) with moderate accuracy.
- Routing: Stable BGP prefix (43.159.128.0/19) with no recent route changes.
Relationships & Neighborhood:
- Linked Entities: Multiple references to ACE-SG network (same subnet).
- Neighborhood: No active neighbors in 43.159.139.0/24 subnet (abuse density: 0).
Actionable Insights:
1. Monitor Subnet Isolation: The IPβs isolated /24 subnet may indicate a dedicated server or internal network.
2. Verify Ownership: Confirm Tencentβs operational presence in Santa Clara, CA, given the ASN and geolocation.
3. Baseline Behavior: No threats detected, but continuous monitoring is recommended for unexpected service changes.
Recommendations:
- No immediate firewall rules or blocks required.
- Investigate if the subnetβs isolation aligns with expected infrastructure patterns.
Source: IPDebrief Threat Intelligence Platform.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | IRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG |
| ASN | AS132203 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 13% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 27% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 22% | 10 | 14 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-16 14:59:15 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-08 00:16:50 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-08 00:26:13 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 21 |
| Total Observations | 22 |
π 21 signal types Β· 22 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.