IPDebrief

43.163.103.45

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.217.135
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 43.163.103.45

Date: 2026-06-07

---

**1. Core Profile**

---

**2. Observation History**

- Single observation logged, showing no active threats or DNS anomalies.

- Historical data limited; no persistent malicious behavior noted.

---

**3. Network Relationships**

- Same network: ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG (43.163.0.0/17).

- DNS associations: Multiple failed queries to private IP `192.168.2.108` (likely internal/invalid).

---

**4. Neighborhood Analysis**

- 43.163.103.13 (risk score: 0, authority score: 50).

---

**5. Threat Assessment**

- Failed DNS queries to private IPs (may indicate misconfigured systems).

- Limited historical data; monitor for new activity.

---

**6. Recommended Actions**

1. Monitor Subnet: Track 43.163.103.0/24 for unexpected traffic or new malicious activity.

2. Verify DNS Configuration: Investigate failed DNS queries to `192.168.2.108` (internal IP).

3. Maintain Baseline: Use historical data to establish normal behavior for this IP.

Conclusion: 43.163.103.45 appears to be a legitimate, low-risk IP associated with Tencent’s network in Singapore. No immediate threat detected, but ongoing monitoring is advised.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

Country🌐 China
Regionβ€”
CitySingapore
Timezoneβ€”
Latitude34.77
Longitude113.72

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationIRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG
ASNAS132203
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRAPNIC
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
27%
22
routing
25%
11
services
19%
12
ownership
27%
23
reputation
13%
12
geolocation
13%
11
Overall21%811
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-16 08:57:12 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-07 21:41:04 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-07 21:46:41 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types18
Total Observations19
πŸ” 18 signal types Β· 19 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.