Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 43.167.245.18
Date: 2026-06-11
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Overall Risk Score: Low (25/100)
- Threat Indicators: No active threats, malicious campaigns, or spam sources detected.
- Network Classification: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports or TLS certificates).
- Provider/Organization: Registered to IRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG (ASN 132203) under APNIC.
---
**2. Geolocation & Ownership**
- Country: Singapore (SG) | City: Tokyo (inconsistent with geolocation data; potential error).
- Coordinates: Latitude 1.35, Longitude 103.82 (Asia/Singapore timezone).
- Ownership Stability: No recent ownership changes.
---
**3. Threat Observations**
- Historical Signals:
- Mixed confidence in geolocation and network classification.
- One observation flagged a China-based IP (CN) with 50+ threat pulses (likely false positive).
- DNSBL Listings: 1/8 DNSBL lists (low confidence; requires validation).
---
**4. Network Relationships**
- Subnet: 43.167.245.18/24 (no abusive neighbors detected).
- Related Entities:
- Same network: ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG (ASN 132203).
---
**5. Actionable Insights**
- Monitor Geolocation Discrepancies: Investigate the conflicting "Tokyo" vs. "Singapore" location.
- Validate DNSBL Listing: Confirm if the IP is flagged on legitimate DNSBLs (e.g., Spamhaus, OpenDNS).
- Check for Anomalies: No open services or TLS certificates detected, but ensure firewalls are configured to block unsolicited traffic.
Recommendation: Low risk, but validate geolocation and DNSBL data for accuracy. No immediate mitigation required.
---
*Generated using IPDebrief threat intelligence tools.*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | IRT-ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG |
| ASN | AS132203 |
| Network Name | ACEVILLEPTELTD-SG |
| CIDR Block | 43.160.0.0/12 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | SG |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 28% | 2 | 2 |
| routing | 20% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 20% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 40% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 20% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 28% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 26% | 9 | 11 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) β 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Low (35%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
β Geo sources disagree on country: CN, SG
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-06-11 00:22:01 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-13 18:52:54 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-13 18:59:36 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 16 |
| Total Observations | 18 |
π 16 signal types Β· 18 observations collected
This report is generated from 16+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.