45.162.20.72
IP Intelligence Briefing: 45.162.20.72/32
*Generated via IPDebrief Threat Intelligence Platform*
---
**Key Risk Indicators**
- Risk Score: 70 (High Risk)
- Network Classification: Firewalled / No Services
- Geolocation: Argentina (Buenos Aires, Cabildo)
- Ownership: Registered to ELDA SALERNO (FULLNET) under ARIN, with abuse contact available via RDAP.
---
**Threat Observations**
- No Direct Malicious Indicators: No malware, phishing, or exploit activity detected.
- DNS Anomalies: Multiple DNS association errors to internal IP `192.168.2.108#53`, suggesting misconfigured DNS resolution or local network issues.
- Subnet Risk Context:
- Subnet: `45.162.20.0/23` (79 IPs total)
- Abuse Density: 8.9% (7 high-risk, 49 medium-risk, 23 low-risk neighbors)
- Notable Neighbors:
- `45.162.20.22` (Risk Score: 70)
- `45.162.20.11` (Risk Score: 55)
---
**Network Behavior**
- Routing: BGP prefix `45.162.20.0/23` with stable route (no recent changes).
- DNSSEC: Validated, with CAA records present.
- DNSBL Listings: Listed in 4/8 DNSBLs (moderate reputation risk).
---
**Actionable Insights**
1. Monitor Subnet Activity: The IP resides in a subnet with mixed risk levels. Investigate neighbors like `45.162.20.22` for potential lateral movement or shared infrastructure risks.
2. Investigate DNS Misconfiguration: The repeated DNS resolution errors to `192.168.2.108` may indicate internal network issues or spoofing attempts.
3. Reputation Checks: While the IP itself lacks direct threats, its DNSBL listings suggest it may be part of a broader network with questionable reputation.
4. Geolocation Verification: Confirm Argentina-based traffic legitimacy, as geolocation data shows no anomalies.
---
Recommendation: Implement subnet-level monitoring and review DNS configurations. No immediate blocking required, but ongoing observation is advised due to the subnet’s abuse density.
*Generated on 2026-06-06 | IPDebrief Threat Intelligence*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | ELDA SALERNO(FULLNET) |
| ASN | AS267690 |
| Network Name | — |
| CIDR Block | — |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | — |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Single-Service Host |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | http | tcp | — |
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (1 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 25% | 2 | 4 |
| ownership | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 13% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 20% | 10 | 15 |
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) — 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Low (35%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-12 09:41:17 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-26 17:10:20 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-26 17:16:41 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 21 |
| Total Observations | 23 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.