IPDebrief

45.86.200.85

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 45.86.200.85

Date: 2026-06-08

**Core Profile**

**Observation History**

- 1 observation with high-severity listings (confidence: 85%).

- Subnet 45.86.200.0/24 linked to SECFIREWALLAS (ASN 206092).

- DNS resolution attempts timed out, suggesting misconfiguration or spoofing.

**Relationships**

- Linked to THE-HAGUE-NL-45-86-200-0 (same subnet).

- DNS records for 45.86.200.85 failed to resolve (multiple timeout errors).

- Subnet 45.86.200.0/24 contains 60 IPs, with 10 high-risk and 50 low-risk siblings.

- Abuse density: 0%, indicating minimal malicious activity in the subnet.

**Actionable Insights**

1. Monitor Subnet Activity: While the IP itself is low risk, the subnet’s 10 high-risk neighbors warrant closer scrutiny.

2. Investigate DNS Issues: The repeated DNS timeout errors may indicate misconfigured DNS settings or spoofing attempts.

3. Validate Ownership: Confirm the legitimacy of VPN Consumer The Hague as the registered owner, as the subnet is associated with a security-focused ASN.

4. Baseline Behavior: The IP’s low risk score and stable geolocation suggest it is likely a legitimate VPN endpoint.

Conclusion: 45.86.200.85 is a low-risk IP associated with a VPN provider in The Hague. While no direct threats are detected, the subnet’s mixed risk profile and DNS anomalies justify continued monitoring.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡³πŸ‡± Netherlands
RegionSouth Holland
CityThe Hague
TimezoneEurope/Amsterdam
Latitude52.13
Longitude5.29

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationVPN Consumer The Hague, The Netherlands
ASNAS206092
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRARIN
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
27%
22
routing
19%
12
services
19%
12
ownership
27%
23
reputation
13%
12
geolocation
13%
11
Overall20%812
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-16 21:01:10 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-08 02:27:12 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-08 02:51:33 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types19
Total Observations20
πŸ” 19 signal types Β· 20 observations collected
This report is generated from 19+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.