45.86.203.32📋 Copy

# IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING: 45.86.203.32/32

Classification: LOW RISK

Date: 2026-07-29

Analyst: IPDebrief Intelligence Team

---

## Executive Summary

IP address 45.86.203.32 is a low-risk infrastructure address with no active threat indicators. The IP is part of the 45.86.203.0/24 CIDR block allocated to UK Dedicated Servers Limited (ASN 42831). No malicious activity, blacklisting, or known campaign associations have been detected. Recommended action: Monitor passively or allow with standard logging.

---

## Ownership and Network Context

---

## Threat Indicators Assessment

Current Status: CLEAN

• Blacklist Count: 0
• Abuse Confidence Score: N/A (not listed)
• Known Attacker: No
• Spam Source: No
• Tor Exit Node: No
• Known Campaigns: None detected
• Threat Persistence Days: 0
• Threat Observation Count: 0

Network Classification:

• Infrastructure Type: Firewalled / No Services
• Is Cloud/CDN/VPN/Proxy/Tor/Hosting/Mobile/Residential: False
• Is Bogon: False
• Is Anycast: False

---

## Geolocation Data

*Note: Geolocation data shows inconsistencies across sources, indicating limited or unreliable geolocation probes for this IP.*

---

## Network Behavior and Services

• Open Ports: None detected
• DNS Resolution: Forward confirmed: False
• PTR Hostnames: None
• Hosted Domains: 0
• Email Authentication: SPF/DMARC: Not configured
• TLS Certificate: Not detected
• HTTP Title/Banner: None

Control Plane Status:

• Route Changes (30d): 0
• Is Route Stable: False
• DNSSEC Valid: True
• RPKI State: Not available
• IRR Consistency: Not available
• DNSBL Listed Count: 0
• DNSBL Total Lists: 8 (monitoring)

Traceroute Analysis:

• Hop Count: 14
• First Hop RTT: 0.1ms
• Last Hop RTT: 98.9ms
• Timed Out Hops: 1
• Transit Networks: Comcast, NTT

---

## Neighborhood Analysis (/24 Subnet)

• Total Neighbors: 58
• Abuse Density: 0 (0% of neighbors flagged as threats)
• Risk Distribution:

- High Risk: 0

- Medium Risk: 1

- Low Risk: 57

• Active Threat Siblings: 0
• Inherited Risk: 0

Sample Neighbor IPs:

| 45.86.203.6

Thinking Process:

1. Analyze the Request:

* Task: Continue the IP intelligence briefing for 45.86.203.32/32 exactly where the previous response left off.

* Constraint: Do not repeat text already written. Finish the remaining answer only.

* Context: The previous response was cut off mid-table (after listing neighbor IPs like 45.86.203.6).

* Role: IP intelligence analyst (IPDebrief).

* Tone: Professional, third person, past tense, factual, based on provided tool data.

* Goal: Complete the "Neighborhood Analysis" section (if needed), add remaining sections like "Observation History", "Recommendations", and conclude the briefing.

2. Review Previous Output:

* The previous output ended at: `| 45.86.203.6 |` inside the "Sample Neighbor IPs" table within the "Neighborhood Analysis (/24 Subnet)" section.

* The table structure was: `| IP Address | Risk Score | Authority Score |`.

* The last row shown was `| 45.86.203.6 |`. It seems incomplete.

* Actually, looking at the data provided in the `ipdebrief_neighbors` tool response: `{"ip":"45.86.203.32","subnet":"45.86.203.32/24","neighborCount":58,"riskDistribution":{"high":0,"medium":1,"low":57},"abuseDensity":0,"neighbors":[{"ip":"45.86.203.2","riskScore":25,"authorityScore":50},{"ip":"45.86.203.3","riskScore":25,"authorityScore":50},{"ip":"45.86.203.4","riskScore":25,"authorityScore":50},{"ip":"45.86.203.5","riskScore":25,"authorityScore":50},{"ip":"45.86.203.6","riskScore":25,"authorityScore":50},"...53 more"]}`.

* The previous output listed the headers and the first row `| 45.86.203.2 | 25 | 50 |`, etc.

* The last line was `| 45.86.203.6`. It needs to be closed properly and the table ended.

* Then I need to add the "Observation History" section based on `ipdebrief_history`.

* Then "Recommendations" based on `ipdebrief_actions`.

* Then "Conclusion".

3. Drafting the Continuation:

* Complete the Table: Finish the row for 45.86.203.6 and close the markdown table syntax.

* Observation History: Use the `ipdebrief_history` data. There were 12 observations. Key signals include ASN lookup, DNSSEC validation, and listing checks. Dates are in the future (2026-07-29) based on the tool data provided (which is a bit odd for a real-time tool, but I must use the data provided).

* Recommendations: The tool returned empty recommendations (`"actions":{"recommendations":[]}`). State this clearly.

* Closing: Standard briefing footer.

4. Checking Constraints:

* "Do not repeat text already written." -> I must not re-write the "Executive Summary", "Ownership", "Threat Indicators", "Geolocation", "Network Behavior", or the start of "Neighborhood Analysis".

* "Finish the remaining answer only." -> Start exactly where the last markdown table row ended.

* "Write in third person, past tense."

* "Do not speculate beyond what the data shows."

5. Refining the Continuation:

* The previous text ended with `| 45.86.203.6`. I need to close that row and the table.

* Then add `Observation History` section.

* Then add `Recommendations` section.

* Then add `Conclusion` section.

*Self-Correction on Data:* The history tool showed dates like `2026-07-29`. This indicates the tool data provided is simulated or future-dated in this context. I will report the data as given without questioning the date, as per instructions to use only returned data.

*Table Completion:*

Previous line: `| 45.86.203.6 |`

Next line should complete that row: `| 25 | 50 |`

Then close table `|`.

Wait, looking closely at the previous output's markdown:

`| 45.86.203.6 | 25 | 50 |`

`...53 more`

`|`

Actually, the previous output cut off at: `| 45.86.203.6`.

So I need to complete the row: `| 25 | 50 |`

Then end the table.

Then move to next sections.

Wait, I need to check if the previous output included the row for 45.86.203.6 or just the start of it.

Previous output end: `| 45.86.203.6 |`

So I continue with `| 25 | 50 |` then close table.

Let's assemble the rest of the briefing.

Observation History:

- 12 total observations.

- Signal types: ASN lookup, DNSSEC, Blacklist checks.

- Confidence levels: 0.30 to 0.90.

- Timestamps: 2026-07-29 (all within minutes).

Recommendations:

- Tool returned empty list.

- State standard operational advice based on risk score (0).

Conclusion:

- Reiterate low risk.

6. Final Polish:

- Ensure no markdown headers are repeated from the previous section (Neighborhood Analysis).

- Ensure flow is logical.

*Wait, one detail:* The previous output ended with `| 45.86.203.6`. It didn't close the row.

So the continuation starts with `| 25 | 50 |`.

Then close the table `|`.

Then add `|` at the end of the table block.

Then add new section.

Let's verify the tool data for neighbors again.

`neighbors":[{"ip":"45.86.203.2","riskScore":25,"authorityScore":50},{"ip":"45.86.203.3","riskScore":25,"authorityScore":50},{"ip":"45.86.203.4","riskScore":25,"authorityScore":50},{"ip":"45.86.203.5","riskScore":25,"authorityScore":50},{"ip":"45.86.203.6","riskScore":25,"authorityScore":50}`

So the row should be `| 45.86.203.6 | 25 | 50 |`.

Okay, ready to write.

*Wait, checking the previous output again:*

It ended with:

`| 45.86.203.6 |`

It did *not* have the rest of the row.

So I must complete the row.

Also, I need to make sure I don't add a new header for "Neighborhood Analysis" since that was already there. I will just continue the table and then start the next major section.

Actually, looking at the previous output, it had:

`Sample Neighbor IPs:`

`| IP Address | Risk Score | Authority Score |`

`| 45.86.203.2 | 25 | 50 |`

`| 45.86.203.3 | 25 | 50 |`

`| 45.86.203.4 | 25 | 50 |`

`| 45.86.203.5 | 25 | 50 |`

`| 45.86.203.6 |`

So I continue with `| 25 | 50 |`.

Then close the table.

Then add the History section.

Then add Recommendations.

Then add Conclusion.

One more thing: The previous output included `...53 more`

The subnet 45.86.203.0/24 exhibited a risk distribution of 57 low-risk addresses and 1 medium-risk address. No high-risk neighbors were detected. Abuse density remained at zero percent.

Observation History

A total of 12 observations were recorded for 45.86.203.32 during the analysis window on 2026-07-29. Key signals include:

• ASN Lookup: Confirmed ASN 42831 (UKSERVERS-AS - UK Dedicated Servers Limited, GB) with a confidence score of 0.85.
• DNSSEC Validation: RRSIG validation confirmed as valid with a confidence score of 0.90.
• Blacklist Checks: Eight total DNSBL lists were queried. The IP was not listed on any of them, with a confidence score of 0.50 for one listing check.
• Ownership Stability: No ownership changes were detected. Threat persistence days remained at zero.
• Service Classification: Multiple probes confirmed the IP is not a CDN, Cloud service, VPN, Proxy, or Tor exit node.

All observations occurred within a 4-minute window (17:41:51 to 17:45:40 UTC).

Recommendations

The IPDebrief actions engine generated no specific recommendations for this IP address. Given the risk score of 0 and the absence of active threat indicators, the following operational guidance is provided based on the collected data:

• Traffic Handling: Allow traffic with standard logging. No firewall blocking is required.
• Threat Hunting: No immediate threat hunting is required.
• Monitoring: Continue passive monitoring for any changes in network behavior or reputation.
• Geolocation: Verify geolocation data (US/Panama/GB discrepancies) if incident correlation requires precise location data.

Conclusion

IP address 45.86.203.32 is classified as low risk. The address belongs to a dedicated server provider with no known malicious activity, blacklistings, or campaign associations. The neighborhood analysis supports a clean environment with minimal abuse density. SOC analysts may treat this IP as benign unless new indicators emerge.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.