49.51.233.46
IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
🤖 Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
Narrative
The IP address 49.51.233.46 is associated with TencentCloud and is located in the United States. There are no significant risk indicators, but the /24 subnet has a high abuse density due to two threat siblings, which is worth monitoring.
Classification Tags
Signal Summary Table
| Category | Finding | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Geolocation | US (Inferred), Latitude: 39.83, Longitude: -98.58 | Very Low |
| Ownership | TencentCloud, ASN 132203 | Low |
| Infrastructure | Cloud | Unknown |
| Threat Lists | Not Listed | Unknown |
| Open Ports | Firewalled / No Services | Unknown |
| Risk Score | 0 | Unknown |
| PTR | Not Available | Unknown |
| FCrDNS | Not Available | Unknown |
| BGP | Stable, AS Path: 6939 132203 | Unknown |
Notable Findings
- ⚠️ Warning: The /24 subnet has an abuse density of 1 due to two threat siblings, indicating potential risk in the neighborhood.
- ✅ Clear: The IP itself shows no significant risk indicators.
- ℹ️ Info: The geolocation is inferred with low confidence.
Recommended Actions
Allow with monitoring — the IP itself appears clean, but the /24 subnet has a high abuse density that requires further observation.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | James Tian |
| ASN | AS132203 |
| Network Name | TencentCloud |
| CIDR Block | 49.51.0.0/16 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | US |
| Abuse Contact | — |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by —
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 33% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 38% | 4 | 5 |
| services | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 37% | 3 | 5 |
| reputation | 28% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 29% | 14 | 21 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions · Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-16 02:31:50 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-15 05:45:36 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-07 18:26:37 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 25 |
| Total Observations | 28 |
🔍 25 signal types · 28 observations collected
This report is generated from 25+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
ℹ️ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata — IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.