IP Intelligence Briefing: 49.51.40.253
Date: 2026-06-08
---
**1. Threat Profile**
- Risk Score: Low (0/100)
- Provider Score: 0
- Authority Score: 0
- Stability Score: 0
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no known campaigns, blacklists, or exploits).
---
**2. Ownership & Geolocation**
- Registrar: TencentCloud (AS: 49.51.0.0/16)
- Geolocation:
- Primary: United States (Santa Clara, CA)
- Secondary: Shenzhen, China (via RDAP registration)
- Discrepancy Note: Conflicting geolocation data suggests potential misconfiguration or spoofing.
---
**3. Network Behavior**
- Subnet: 49.51.40.0/24 (abuse density: 0%)
- Neighbors:
- 1 sibling IP (49.51.40.180) with medium risk score (50).
- Subnet appears clean, but one neighbor raises caution.
- Services: No open ports or TLS certificates detected.
---
**4. Temporal Observations**
- First Seen: 2026-05-22
- Last Seen: 2026-06-08
- Key Trends:
- Stable ownership (TencentCloud) with no ownership changes.
- Geolocation data shifted between U.S. and China.
- No persistent malicious activity.
---
**5. Relationships**
- Linked Entities:
- TencentCloud (same network).
- DNS associations (timed-out queries to 192.168.2.108).
- Recommendation: Investigate DNS resolution issues; verify TencentCloud's IP legitimacy.
---
**6. Actionable Insights**
- SOC Analyst Tasks:
- Monitor subnet for unusual traffic (focus on 49.51.40.180).
- Validate geolocation discrepancies with TencentCloud.
- Check for DNS misconfigurations or spoofing.
- Firewall Rules:
- Block 49.51.40.180 if high-risk activity is confirmed.
- Allow TencentCloud IPs with explicit whitelisting.
---
Conclusion:
The IP is associated with a legitimate cloud provider but exhibits conflicting geolocation data. While currently low risk, the presence of a medium-risk neighbor warrants further investigation. Monitor for anomalies in the subnet and validate DNS/geo inconsistencies.
Tools Used: `ipdebrief_profile`, `ipdebrief_history`, `ipdebrief_relationships`, `ipdebrief_neighbors`.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | James Tian |
| ASN | AS132203 |
| Network Name | TencentCloud |
| CIDR Block | 49.51.0.0/16 |
| RIR | APNIC |
| Country | US |
| Abuse Contact | β |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 19% | 2 | 2 |
| reputation | 13% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 27% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 16% | 8 | 9 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-16 14:59:27 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-13 03:45:55 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-08 00:55:16 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 18 |
| Total Observations | 19 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.