IPDebrief

49.51.40.253

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 49.51.40.253

Date: 2026-06-08

---

**1. Threat Profile**

---

**2. Ownership & Geolocation**

- Primary: United States (Santa Clara, CA)

- Secondary: Shenzhen, China (via RDAP registration)

---

**3. Network Behavior**

- 1 sibling IP (49.51.40.180) with medium risk score (50).

- Subnet appears clean, but one neighbor raises caution.

---

**4. Temporal Observations**

- Stable ownership (TencentCloud) with no ownership changes.

- Geolocation data shifted between U.S. and China.

- No persistent malicious activity.

---

**5. Relationships**

- TencentCloud (same network).

- DNS associations (timed-out queries to 192.168.2.108).

---

**6. Actionable Insights**

- Monitor subnet for unusual traffic (focus on 49.51.40.180).

- Validate geolocation discrepancies with TencentCloud.

- Check for DNS misconfigurations or spoofing.

- Block 49.51.40.180 if high-risk activity is confirmed.

- Allow TencentCloud IPs with explicit whitelisting.

---

Conclusion:

The IP is associated with a legitimate cloud provider but exhibits conflicting geolocation data. While currently low risk, the presence of a medium-risk neighbor warrants further investigation. Monitor for anomalies in the subnet and validate DNS/geo inconsistencies.

Tools Used: `ipdebrief_profile`, `ipdebrief_history`, `ipdebrief_relationships`, `ipdebrief_neighbors`.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
RegionCA
CitySanta Clara
Timezoneβ€”
Latitude37.35
Longitude-121.95

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationJames Tian
ASNAS132203
Network NameTencentCloud
CIDR Block49.51.0.0/16
RIRAPNIC
CountryUS
Abuse Contactβ€”

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
13%
11
routing
13%
11
services
13%
11
ownership
19%
22
reputation
13%
12
geolocation
27%
22
Overall16%89
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-16 14:59:27 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-13 03:45:55 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-08 00:55:16 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types18
Total Observations19
πŸ” 18 signal types Β· 19 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.