Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 5.167.67.154
Date: June 10, 2026
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Risk Score: 40 (Moderate Risk)
- Threat Indicators: No malicious indicators (no known attacker, spam, or Tor exit).
- Network Classification: Residential endpoint (ER-Telecom, Russia).
- Geolocation: Cheboksary, Russia (RU).
---
**2. Ownership & Subnet**
- ASN: 57026 (ER-Telecom Holding).
- Subnet: 5.167.67.154/24.
- Subnet Abuse Density: High (100% abuse density).
- Neighboring IPs: 256 total IPs in subnet; 178 active, 256 flagged as abusive.
---
**3. Observation History**
- Recent Activity (Last 30 Days):
- Minimal risk signals (operator score: 0.13).
- ICMP validation blocked, preventing full geolocation verification.
- No persistent malicious behavior detected.
---
**4. Relationships & Network Context**
- Linked Networks: ERTH-CHEB-PPPOE-22-NET (residential PPPoE network).
- Neighbor Risk: 100 IPs in subnet flagged as abusive (risk scores 40β49).
- Shared Infrastructure: Residential ISP network with potential for compromised devices.
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Monitor Subnet: High abuse density suggests potential for lateral movement or botnet activity.
- Block IP: Consider blocking due to residential network association with abusive neighbors.
- Verify ISP: Confirm ER-Telecomβs security practices for residential users.
- Check DNS: Validate PTR records (`5x167x67x154.dynamic.cheb.ertelecom.ru`) for spoofing risks.
---
Note: ICMP blocking may obscure deeper network validation. Use passive monitoring tools to assess subnet-wide anomalies.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Network Operation Center CJSC ER-Telecom Holding Cheboksary branch |
| ASN | AS57026 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR | 5x167x67x154.dynamic.cheb.ertelecom.ru |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
| Forward Hostnames | 5x167x67x154.dynamic.cheb.ertelecom.ru |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 60% (Good) |
| SPF | Present |
| DMARC | Present |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Residential |
| Service Purpose | Residential Endpoint |
| Network Tier | End-User β Residential ISP endpoint |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 28% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 20% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 30% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 31% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 24% | 10 | 15 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:05:24 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-26 18:12:14 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-27 05:34:28 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 21 |
| Total Observations | 50 |
π 21 signal types Β· 50 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.