IPDebrief

5.167.68.72

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING: 5.167.68.72/32

## Executive Summary

IP Address: 5.167.68.72/32

Risk Classification: Moderate Risk (Score: 49/100)

Network Role: Residential Endpoint

Threat Status: Known Attacker (DNSBL Listed)

Recommended Action: Block at network edge

---

## Ownership and Registration

---

## Threat Intelligence Indicators

---

## Network Behavior Analysis

---

## Historical Signal Analysis

Observation Window: 48 total observations over recent monitoring period

---

## Subnet Neighborhood Analysis (5.167.68.0/24)

---

## Related Entities (364 Relationships)

---

## Recommended Security Actions

Immediate Actions:

1. Block at Network Edge: Implement IP-based blocking

2. Firewall Rules: Deploy recommended rules across infrastructure platforms

Platform-Specific Rules:

```bash

# iptables

iptables -A INPUT -s 5.167.68.72 -j DROP

# nftables

nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 5.167.68.72 drop

# nginx

deny 5.167.68.72;

# pfSense

5.167.68.72/32

# Cloudflare WAF

{"description": "Block 5.167.68.72 โ€” IPDebrief risk score 49", "action": "block", "filter": {"expression": "ip.src eq 5.167.68.72"}}

# AWS WAF

{"Addresses": ["5.167.68.72/32"], "Description": "IPDebrief risk 49"}

```

Monitoring Recommendations:

---

## Intelligence Assessment

This IP represents a Russian residential endpoint with known attacker indicators and DNSBL listing. The threat level is moderate rather than critical, but the known attacker classification warrants defensive blocking. The subnet shows low-abuse-density characteristics with isolated threat activity. No evidence of infrastructure hosting or organized campaign participation detected.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia
RegionCU
CityCheboksary
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude55.74
Longitude37.61

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationNetwork Operation Center CJSC ER-Telecom Holding Cheboksary branch
ASNAS57026
Network Nameโ€”
CIDR Blockโ€”
RIRRIPE
Countryโ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTR5x167x68x72.dynamic.cheb.ertelecom.ru
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnames5x167x68x72.dynamic.cheb.ertelecom.ru

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score60% (Good)
SPFPresent
DMARCPresent
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureResidential
Service PurposeResidential Endpoint
Network TierEnd-User โ€” Residential ISP endpoint
Residential

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
30%
34
routing
13%
11
services
12%
22
ownership
24%
23
reputation
34%
23
geolocation
27%
23
Overall23%1216
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:05:25 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-26 18:12:15 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-27 05:25:09 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types23
Total Observations51
๐Ÿ” 23 signal types ยท 51 observations collected
This report is generated from 23+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.