Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 50.116.12.48
Date: 2026-06-12
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Reputation: Moderate Risk (Risk Score: 50)
- Provider: Linode (ASN: AS63949)
- Geolocation: Fremont, CA, US (Data Center Hub)
- Network Role: Cloud Compute Instance (Hosting, No Public Services)
---
**2. Threat Indicators**
- No Detected Threats: No malware, phishing, or malicious activity reported.
- DNS Associations: Linked to `binaryedge.ninja` (no abuse indicators).
- BGP Stability: Route stable (no recent changes).
---
**3. Observation History**
- Recent Activity (June 2026):
- Low-risk signals (confidence: 0.18β0.75).
- No persistent malicious behavior or campaign correlations.
- Historical Trends: No significant changes in risk or network behavior.
---
**4. Network Relationships**
- Same Network: Part of Linodeβs infrastructure (50.116.0.0/18).
- DNS: Resolves to `prod-bromine-us-west-42.li.binaryedge.ninja` (no malicious flags).
- Subnet: 50.116.12.48/24 (clean, no abuse density).
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Monitor: Track DNS and BGP changes for anomalies.
- No Immediate Action: No high-risk indicators, but maintain standard cloud security practices.
- Verify: Confirm `binaryedge.ninja`βs legitimacy if critical services depend on this IP.
---
Conclusion: This IP is part of a legitimate cloud infrastructure with no current threat indicators. Moderate risk is likely due to network exposure, but no urgent mitigation is required.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Linode |
| ASN | AS63949 |
| Network Name | LINODE |
| CIDR Block | 50.116.0.0/18 |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | United States |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR | prod-bromine-us-west-42.li.binaryedge.ninja |
| Forward Confirmed | Yes β FCrDNS verified |
| Forward Hostnames | prod-bromine-us-west-42.li.binaryedge.ninja |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 60% (Good) |
| SPF | Present |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Single-Service Host |
| Network Tier | Tier 3 β Basic operator with some routing infrastructure |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | ssh | tcp | |
| Closed Ports | 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (1 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
| SSH Version | SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.9p1 Ubuntu-3ubuntu0.15 |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 33% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 21% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 30% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 28% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 25% | 10 | 16 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) β 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Moderate (55%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
β Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-06-01 11:44:55 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-21 07:34:35 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-21 07:36:48 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 24 |
| Total Observations | 26 |
π 24 signal types Β· 26 observations collected
This report is generated from 24+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.