# IP Intelligence Briefing: 51.116.117.203/32
## Executive Summary
Threat Classification: HIGH RISK (Score: 80/100)
Infrastructure Type: CloudCompute (Microsoft Azure)
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany (AS8075)
Last Updated: 2026-06-15
---
## Risk Profile Assessment
Current Risk Indicators:
- Risk Score: 80 (High Risk classification)
- Blacklist Status: Listed on 5 of 8 DNSBLs
- Threat Pulse Count: 10 active threat indicators
- Reputation: High Risk designation
Network Classification:
- ASN: 8075 (Microsoft Corporation)
- BGP Prefix: 51.116.0.0/16
- Route Stability: UNSTABLE (route changes detected)
- Infrastructure: CloudCompute with firewalled/no services state
- RPKI State: Unknown
- Operator Score: 0.1304 (Minimal)
---
## Behavioral Analysis
Observation History (18 signals):
- Most recent activity: 2026-06-15T10:19:04 UTC
- Threat persistence: Active (multiple threat pulses detected)
- Geolocation consistency: Confirmed Frankfurt, DE across multiple probes
- ICMP validation: Blocked (unable to validate)
- Historical threat observation count: 0 (new threat emergence)
Service State:
- Open Ports: None detected
- HTTP Services: None
- TLS Certificates: None
- State: Firewalled / No Services
---
## Network Context & Relationships
Subnet Analysis (51.116.117.0/24):
- Abuse Density: 0 (Clean)
- Active Siblings: 1
- Threat Siblings: 0
- Classification: Clean
Network Relationships:
- 18 relationships identified
- All classified as "Same Network" with cloud infrastructure designation
- No direct organizational or hostname relationships detected
Campaign Correlation:
- Campaign Likelihood: None
- Certificate Matches: 0
- Correlated IPs: 0
---
## Recommended Actions
Immediate Security Controls:
1. Monitor Closely: Despite clean neighborhood, the 80 risk score warrants active monitoring
2. DNSBL Validation: Investigate the 5 DNSBL listings to identify potential reputation impacts
3. Route Stability: Monitor BGP route changes for AS8075
4. Cloud Context: Treat as Microsoft Azure infrastructureβcorrelate with Azure abuse patterns
5. Threat Pulse Analysis: Investigate the 10 detected threat pulses for campaign attribution
Firewall Recommendations:
- Block if receiving inbound connections from this IP
- Monitor outbound traffic to/from this IP for C2 patterns
- Consider geo-blocking based on Frankfurt origin if business policy requires
---
## Intelligence Assessment
This IP represents a Microsoft Azure cloud instance with elevated risk indicators despite operating in a clean subnet. The high risk score (80) combined with 10 threat pulses and multiple DNSBL listings suggests potential malicious activity. However, the absence of open ports, clean neighborhood profile, and no detected campaigns indicate this may be a compromised cloud asset rather than an actively attacking IP.
Priority: MEDIUM-HIGH (monitor until threat pulses resolve or campaign attribution confirmed)
SOC Analyst Action: Add to watchlist, monitor for outbound connections, correlate with Azure abuse reports, investigate DNSBL listing sources.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Divya Quamara |
| ASN | AS8075 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 25% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 12% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 24% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 26% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 33% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 21% | 10 | 16 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-20 17:48:39 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-28 12:23:26 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-29 06:28:34 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 20 |
| Total Observations | 23 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.