IPDebrief

51.116.117.203

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 51.116.117.203/32

## Executive Summary

Threat Classification: HIGH RISK (Score: 80/100)

Infrastructure Type: CloudCompute (Microsoft Azure)

Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany (AS8075)

Last Updated: 2026-06-15

---

## Risk Profile Assessment

Current Risk Indicators:

Network Classification:

---

## Behavioral Analysis

Observation History (18 signals):

Service State:

---

## Network Context & Relationships

Subnet Analysis (51.116.117.0/24):

Network Relationships:

Campaign Correlation:

---

## Recommended Actions

Immediate Security Controls:

1. Monitor Closely: Despite clean neighborhood, the 80 risk score warrants active monitoring

2. DNSBL Validation: Investigate the 5 DNSBL listings to identify potential reputation impacts

3. Route Stability: Monitor BGP route changes for AS8075

4. Cloud Context: Treat as Microsoft Azure infrastructureβ€”correlate with Azure abuse patterns

5. Threat Pulse Analysis: Investigate the 10 detected threat pulses for campaign attribution

Firewall Recommendations:

---

## Intelligence Assessment

This IP represents a Microsoft Azure cloud instance with elevated risk indicators despite operating in a clean subnet. The high risk score (80) combined with 10 threat pulses and multiple DNSBL listings suggests potential malicious activity. However, the absence of open ports, clean neighborhood profile, and no detected campaigns indicate this may be a compromised cloud asset rather than an actively attacking IP.

Priority: MEDIUM-HIGH (monitor until threat pulses resolve or campaign attribution confirmed)

SOC Analyst Action: Add to watchlist, monitor for outbound connections, correlate with Azure abuse reports, investigate DNSBL listing sources.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ Germany
RegionHE
CityFrankfurt am Main
TimezoneEurope/Berlin
Latitude51.17
Longitude10.45

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDivya Quamara
ASNAS8075
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRARIN
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting β€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
25%
24
routing
8%
11
services
12%
22
ownership
24%
23
reputation
26%
13
geolocation
33%
23
Overall21%1016
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-20 17:48:39 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-28 12:23:26 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-29 06:28:34 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types20
Total Observations23
πŸ” 20 signal types Β· 23 observations collected
This report is generated from 20+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.