IPDebrief

51.161.37.38

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 51.161.37.38/32

## Executive Summary

IP address 51.161.37.38 is registered to OVH infrastructure under customer OVH-CUST-281059684. The IP presents a Moderate Risk profile (risk score: 40) and operates within a subnet exhibiting high abuse density. A critical geolocation discrepancy detectedβ€”listed country CA (Canada) with city Singaporeβ€”suggests potential configuration inconsistencies or anonymization techniques.

## Infrastructure Profile

Ownership:

Network Role:

DNS Resolution:

## Threat Assessment

Direct Threat Indicators:

Control Plane:

## Neighborhood Analysis

Subnet: 51.161.37.0/24

Risk Distribution:

The subnet demonstrates elevated abuse activity, with approximately 74.6% of addresses flagged as threat-related.

## Observation History

Total Observations: 22

Recent Activity: Multiple signals observed through 2026-06-28

Key Historical Signals:

No persistent malicious activity detected. Threat observation count: 1.

## Geolocation Anomaly

Reported Location: Singapore

Listed Country: CA (Canada)

Distance Validation: 6,082 km

Minimum Possible RTT: 121.6ms

Observed RTT: 27.0ms

Violation: RTT significantly below geographic minimum

This discrepancy indicates either:

## Relationships

Total Relationships: 46

Primary Associations: Same Network (OVH-CUST-281059684) - 41+ instances

No unique organizational or hostname relationships beyond network-level associations.

## Recommended Actions

1. Monitor Subnet Activity: Given the 74.6% abuse density in the /24 subnet, implement monitoring for related addresses in 51.161.37.0/24.

2. Validate Geolocation: The Canada/Singapore discrepancy warrants investigation. Cross-reference with known Ahrefs infrastructure locations.

3. Traffic Analysis: Review inbound/outbound traffic patterns for potential C2 or data exfiltration indicators.

4. DNS Reputation: Monitor ahrefs.net domain for associated malicious activity, given the PTR hostname association.

5. Block Decision: Consider blocking based on subnet-level risk profile if internal policy permits, or at minimum monitor closely for suspicious outbound connections.

## Risk Conclusion

IP 51.161.37.38 presents moderate risk primarily due to high-abuse neighborhood context and geolocation inconsistencies. While no direct threat indicators are present for this specific address, the subnet's 74.6% abuse density suggests elevated risk environment. SOC teams should monitor related subnet activity and validate infrastructure location claims.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Canada
Regionβ€”
CitySingapore
Timezoneβ€”
Latitude43.63
Longitude-79.37

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059684
CIDR Block51.161.37.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactβ€”

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca005-san38.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca005-san38.ahrefs.net

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting β€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
32%
24
routing
13%
11
services
12%
22
ownership
19%
22
reputation
31%
13
geolocation
31%
23
Overall23%1015
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) β€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
⚠ Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-18 03:23:23 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-28 06:31:12 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-29 06:36:41 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types21
Total Observations26
πŸ” 21 signal types Β· 26 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.