IPDebrief

51.161.37.88

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# Intelligence Briefing: 51.161.37.88/32

Classification: Moderate Risk | Report Date: Current | Source: IPDebrief Intelligence Platform

---

## Executive Summary

IP 51.161.37.88 is a cloud-hosted address assigned to OVH network customer OVH-CUST-281059684 under ASN 16276. The IP resolves to the ahrefs.net domain infrastructure and resides within a high-abuse-density subnet (51.161.37.0/24). While the IP itself shows moderate risk scoring (40/100) with no active threat indicators, the neighborhood exhibits elevated abuse density (0.7383), with 189 of 256 sibling IPs flagged as threats.

---

## Network Identity & Ownership

AttributeValue
**ASN**16276
**Organization**Dmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
**Network Name**OVH-CUST-281059684
**Provider**OVH
**Infrastructure Type**CloudCompute
**Geolocation**Canada (CA)
**PTR Hostname**proxy-ca005-san88.ahrefs.net

The IP is registered under an OVH hosting customer account. DNS resolution confirms association with ahrefs.net, a legitimate SEO analytics platform. No open ports were detected, indicating the host is either firewalled or inactive.

---

## Risk Assessment

Overall Risk Score: 40/100 (Moderate Risk)

Threat Indicators:

Control Plane Data:

---

## Neighborhood Analysis

Subnet: 51.161.37.0/24

MetricValue
**Abuse Density**0.7383 (High Abuse)
**Inherited Risk**29/100
**Total Siblings**256
**Active Siblings**205
**Threat Siblings**189

The /24 subnet demonstrates significant abuse concentration. Nearly 74% of the subnet is classified as high abuse, with 189 IPs actively flagged as threats. This contextualizes the IP's moderate risk score within a hostile network environment.

---

## Geolocation Validation

Discrepancy Detected: Reported geolocation shows Singapore with 3,000km accuracy radius, but RTT validation indicates a violation. Measured RTT (26ms) falls below the minimum possible RTT (121.6ms) for the reported 6,082km distance, suggesting geolocation data may be inaccurate or the IP may be using anycast/mirror infrastructure.

---

## Historical Signal Observations

24 observations recorded. Key historical signals include:

No persistent malicious behavior detected over the observation window.

---

## Recommended Actions

Immediate Mitigation:

```bash

# iptables

iptables -A INPUT -s 51.161.37.88 -j DROP

# nftables

nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 51.161.37.88 drop

# nginx

deny 51.161.37.88;

# pfSense

51.161.37.88/32

# Cloudflare WAF

{

"description": "Block 51.161.37.88 โ€” IPDebrief risk score 40",

"action": "block",

"filter": {"expression": "ip.src eq 51.161.37.88"}

}

# AWS WAF

{

"Addresses": ["51.161.37.88/32"],

"Description": "IPDebrief risk 40"

}

```

Analysis Note: While the IP carries a moderate risk score with no direct threat indicators, the high-abuse-density neighborhood and subnet-level threat concentration warrant defensive blocking. The ahrefs.net association suggests this may be infrastructure for a legitimate SEO service, but the elevated neighborhood risk suggests compromised or abused accounts within the same hosting block.

---

## Intelligence Conclusion

IP 51.161.37.88 represents a moderate-risk address within a high-abuse-density OVH hosting subnet. The IP resolves to legitimate ahrefs.net infrastructure but operates in a network environment where 73.8% of sibling IPs are classified as abusive. No active threat indicators are present against this specific IP. SOC teams should weigh the subnet-level risk against the legitimate service association when determining blocking policies. Consider implementing subnet-level monitoring for 51.161.37.0/24 to detect coordinated abuse campaigns.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada
Regionโ€”
CitySingapore
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude43.63
Longitude-79.37

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059684
CIDR Block51.161.37.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactโ€”

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca005-san88.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca005-san88.ahrefs.net

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting โ€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
31%
24
routing
13%
11
services
15%
22
ownership
19%
22
reputation
28%
13
geolocation
35%
23
Overall24%1015
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) โ€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
โš  Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:04:25 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-27 06:20:34 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-28 00:24:02 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types23
Total Observations28
๐Ÿ” 23 signal types ยท 28 observations collected
This report is generated from 23+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.