IPDebrief

51.161.65.166

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 51.161.65.166/32

Classification: Moderate Risk (Risk Score: 40) | Reputation: Cloud Infrastructure Node

---

## Executive Summary

IP 51.161.65.166 is an OVH CloudCompute node hosted under Ahrefs Pte Ltd infrastructure. The IP resolves to ahostname (proxy-ca011-san166.ahrefs.net) associated with the SEO analytics service ahrefs.net. Despite moderate overall risk, the IP resides within a subnet exhibiting high abuse density (0.6914), with 69% of active siblings classified as threats.

---

## Technical Profile

AttributeValue
**ASN**16276 (OVH)
**Organization**Dmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
**Netname**OVH-CUST-281059690
**Geolocation**Montreal, QC, CA
**Infrastructure**CloudCompute (Hosting Provider)
**DNS PTR**proxy-ca011-san166.ahrefs.net
**Forward Resolution**ahrefs.net
**Open Ports**None detected
**TLS Certificate**Not configured

---

## Risk Assessment

Current Risk Indicators

Control Plane Analysis

---

## Neighborhood Analysis

Subnet: 51.161.65.0/24

MetricValue
**Total Siblings**256
**Active Siblings**207
**Threat Siblings**177 (85.5% of active)
**Abuse Density**0.6914 (High)
**Inherited Risk Score**27/100

Risk Distribution:

Assessment: The subnet demonstrates significant abuse concentration. While the target IP lacks direct threat indicators, its proximity to 177 threat-sibling IPs warrants contextual awareness.

---

## Observation History

Key Signals (Last Observation Window)

1. Ownership Signal (Confidence: 0.85) - Stable ownership

2. Subnet Abuse Density (Confidence: 0.75) - High abuse classification

3. BGP Routing (Confidence: 0.20) - Not classified as attacker/TOR/spam source

4. Operator Risk (Confidence: 0.60) - Minimal operator score

5. Overall Profile (Confidence: 0.22) - Insufficient data sufficiency

---

## Geographic Validation

---

## Relationships & Network Graph

---

## Recommended Actions

Immediate

1. Monitor Subnet Activity: 69% of neighbors show threat behavior. Apply monitoring filters to the 51.161.65.0/24 subnet.

2. Geographic Verification: Validate actual source location due to RTT/geolocation discrepancy.

3. Traffic Baseline: Establish baseline traffic patterns for this cloud node.

Firewall Rules

```bash

# Monitor traffic from this subnet (low-confidence threat)

iptables -A INPUT -s 51.161.65.0/24 -j LOG --log-prefix "OVH-AHREFS-TRAFFIC: "

```

Alerting

---

## Final Assessment

IP 51.161.65.166 presents a moderate risk profile as a legitimate cloud infrastructure node with no direct threat indicators. However, the high-abuse neighborhood (177 threat siblings in the same /24) necessitates contextual monitoring. The geolocation violation requires verification before definitive location-based decisions. No immediate blocking is recommended, but continued observation and subnet-level awareness are advised.

Threat Level: LOW (with HIGH neighborhood risk)

Action: Monitor, do not block

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada
RegionQC
CityMontreal
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude43.63
Longitude-79.37

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059690
CIDR Block51.161.65.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactโ€”

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca011-san166.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca011-san166.ahrefs.net

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting โ€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
31%
24
routing
13%
11
services
15%
22
ownership
19%
22
reputation
31%
13
geolocation
33%
23
Overall24%1015
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) โ€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
โš  Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-21 21:00:51 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-28 16:11:27 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-29 04:15:50 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types21
Total Observations25
๐Ÿ” 21 signal types ยท 25 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.