IPDebrief

51.161.65.235

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 51.161.65.235

Date: 2026-06-06

---

**1. Core Profile**

---

**2. Threat & Abuse Indicators**

- 51.161.65.0/24 has high_abuse classification (abuse density 51%).

- 127/249 siblings in subnet show threat activity.

- 167 active IPs in subnet, with 93 medium-risk and 7 low-risk neighbors.

---

**3. Historical Observations**

- Last 30 days: 21 observations (moderate risk).

- Geo validation issues: RTT of 26ms for 6,082km distance (implausible).

- Network stability: Route changes detected (unstable routing).

---

**4. Relationships & Network Context**

- Subnet: `51.161.65.0/24` (OVH-CUST-281059690).

- DNS: Ahrefs (`ahrefs.net`).

- No direct ties to known malicious campaigns or organizations.

---

**5. Recommendations**

1. Monitor Subnet: The `/24` subnet has high abuse density; investigate neighboring IPs for potential lateral movement.

2. Verify Geolocation: The IP’s low RTT for Montreal, Canada, may indicate spoofing or proxy activity.

3. Check DNSBL Status: Confirm why this IP is listed on 1/8 DNSBLs; investigate potential false positives or minor abuse.

4. Network Segmentation: Ensure cloud compute instances are isolated to prevent internal exposure.

---

Conclusion:

This IP is associated with a legitimate cloud provider (OVH) and appears to host a server for Ahrefs. While no direct threats are detected, the subnet’s high abuse density and geo validation anomalies warrant further investigation. SOC teams should monitor for unusual traffic patterns or changes in subnet behavior.

*Generated by IPDebrief | © 2026 Jason Alberino*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Canada
RegionQC
CityMontreal
Timezoneβ€”
Latitude43.63
Longitude-79.37

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059690
CIDR Block51.161.65.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactβ€”

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca011-san235.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca011-san235.ahrefs.net

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting β€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
28%
24
routing
13%
11
services
20%
23
ownership
15%
22
reputation
27%
13
geolocation
37%
23
Overall23%1016
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) β€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
⚠ Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-11 02:51:41 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-27 18:54:44 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-28 13:01:10 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types21
Total Observations27
πŸ” 21 signal types Β· 27 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.