51.195.244.56📋 Copy

## IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING: 51.195.244.56

Date: 2026-06-20

Classification: Moderate Risk (Score: 50/100)

Assigned To: SOC Operations

---

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 51.195.244.56 presents a moderate-risk profile associated with OVH hosting infrastructure in London, GB. The IP is associated with Ahrefs Pte Ltd Dmytro and is DNS-resolved to proxy-uk000-san56.ahrefs.net. While no active threat indicators were detected on this specific IP, the parent subnet (51.195.244.0/24) demonstrates elevated abuse characteristics requiring contextual awareness.

---

TECHNICAL PROFILE

---

THREAT INDICATORS

Positive Signals:

• No active threat indicators detected
• Not classified as Tor exit node, VPN, or proxy
• Not flagged as known attacker or spam source
• DNSSEC validation: Valid
• CAA records present

Negative Signals:

• Listed on 2 out of 8 DNSBL sources
• Zero SPF/DMARC email authentication records
• No TLS certificate detected

---

NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS (51.195.244.0/24)

The parent subnet exhibits significant abuse concentration:

Risk Distribution: 100 medium-risk neighbors, 0 high/low risk

This elevated neighborhood abuse density suggests the subnet may be leveraged for distributed activities. The target IP carries inherited risk from this environment.

---

OBSERVATION HISTORY

Total Observations: 23 signals tracked

Recent Activity:

• Operator Score: 0.2174 (Minimal)
• DNSSEC: Valid
• CAA Records: Present
• Infrastructure Type: CloudCompute (OVH)
• No persistent malicious behavior detected
• Ownership changes: 0

The IP demonstrates stability in ownership and infrastructure classification over the observation period.

---

RELATIONSHIP GRAPH

Total Relationships: 39

• 34+ relationships identified as "Same Network" (OVH_282347336)
• No external organization or certificate relationships detected
• Limited interconnection footprint

---

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Firewall Rules (Deploy with validation):

Operational Guidance:

1. Review inbound traffic from 51.195.244.0/24 subnet

2. Monitor for patterns across multiple IPs in the /24

3. Consider rate limiting rather than blocking if legitimate traffic is expected

4. Validate against internal threat detection before implementing permanent blocks

---

Intelligence Source: IPDebrief Platform

Data Currency: Current (2026-06-20)

Confidence Level: Moderate (based on neighborhood context)

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.