IPDebrief

51.222.168.137

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING

Target: 51.222.168.137/32

Classification: Moderate Risk

Date: Current Intelligence Cycle

---

## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 51.222.168.137 is a cloud-compute endpoint hosted on OVH infrastructure with a risk score of 40 (Moderate Risk). The IP resolves to Ahrefs proxy infrastructure but exhibits significant geolocation anomalies and operates within a subnet classified as high-abuse density. No active threat indicators are currently present, but the network context warrants defensive monitoring.

---

## OWNERSHIP & INFRASTRUCTURE

AttributeValue
ASN16276
OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ProviderOVH
Infrastructure TypeCloudCompute
CIDR Block51.222.168.0/24
Network RoleFirewalled / No Services

The IP operates on OVH hosting infrastructure. DNS records resolve to `proxy-ca018-san137.ahrefs.net`, indicating association with Ahrefs proxy services. No open ports or active services were detected.

---

## GEOLOCATION VALIDATION

Status: FAILED

The geolocation data is geographically implausible. The measured RTT (27ms) is less than 25% of the minimum physically possible RTT (112ms) for the claimed distance, indicating spoofed or unreliable location metadata.

---

## THREAT ASSESSMENT

IndicatorStatus
Known AttackerNo
Tor Exit NodeNo
Spam SourceNo
Blacklist Count0
DNSBL Listed1 of 8 lists
Risk Score40 (Moderate)
Provider Score0
Authority Score0

No active threat indicators detected. However, the IP appears on 1 of 8 DNSBL lists. The subnet 51.222.168.0/24 exhibits high abuse density (0.7812) with 200 threat siblings among 256 total addresses.

---

## NETWORK CONTEXT

The subnet demonstrates significant abuse prevalence. Over 78% of addresses in the /24 block are associated with abuse activity.

---

## OBSERVATION HISTORY

Historical data indicates no persistent malicious behavior, but recurring subnet abuse classification is consistent.

---

## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Given the moderate risk score, geolocation anomalies, and high-abuse subnet context, the following defensive measures are recommended:

Firewall Rules

```bash

# iptables

iptables -A INPUT -s 51.222.168.137 -j DROP

# nftables

nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 51.222.168.137 drop

```

WAF Rules

```json

// Cloudflare WAF

{

"description": "Block 51.222.168.137 โ€” IPDebrief risk score 40",

"action": "block",

"filter": {

"expression": "ip.src eq 51.222.168.137"

}

}

```

---

## INTELLIGENCE NOTES

1. Ahrefs Association: DNS hostname indicates proxy infrastructure for Ahrefs, a legitimate SEO tools company. However, the geolocation discrepancy and subnet abuse density suggest the IP may be repurposed for proxy services.

2. Subnet Context: The /24 block shows 78% abuse density. This IP should be treated as part of a potentially compromised subnet environment.

3. Monitoring Priority: Moderate. While not actively malicious, the IP warrants continued monitoring due to subnet-level abuse patterns and geolocation spoofing.

4. Action Threshold: Current risk score (40) suggests blocking is defensible but should be combined with additional signals before enforcement.

---

*Intelligence generated via IPDebrief® platform. Data accuracy subject to continuous verification.*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada
RegionQC
CitySingapore
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude45.51
Longitude-73.59

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059697
CIDR Block51.222.168.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactโ€”

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca018-san137.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca018-san137.ahrefs.net

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting โ€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
26%
24
routing
13%
11
services
20%
23
ownership
15%
22
reputation
28%
13
geolocation
32%
23
Overall23%1016
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) โ€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
โš  Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:04:26 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-27 06:49:44 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-28 00:55:59 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types21
Total Observations28
๐Ÿ” 21 signal types ยท 28 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.