IPDebrief

51.222.168.14

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 51.222.168.14/32

Date: 2026-06-18

---

**1. Core Profile**

---

**2. Observation History**

- Minimal risk label (operator score 0.2174).

- Subnet abuse density: High (0.668), with 171/256 siblings flagged as threats.

- DNS resolution to *proxy-ca018-san14.ahrefs.net* (linked to ahrefs.net).

- Stable risk profile over 13 days.

- No persistent malicious activity (threat persistence days: 0).

---

**3. Network Relationships**

- DNS: *proxy-ca018-san14.ahrefs.net* (no email auth records).

- BGP: Route prefix *51.222.0.0/16* (OVH-controlled, no route stability issues).

- High abuse density (0.668).

- 99/100 neighboring IPs in the 51.222.168.0/24 subnet are medium/high risk.

---

**4. Threat Context**

---

**5. Recommended Actions**

1. Monitor Subnet Traffic: Given the high abuse density in the 51.222.168.0/24 subnet, prioritize monitoring for anomalous traffic patterns.

2. Verify DNS Configuration: Investigate the Singapore-based DNS resolution for *proxy-ca018-san14.ahrefs.net* to ensure no misconfiguration or spoofing.

3. Check for Compromised Neighbors: Use IPDebrief to audit high-risk IPs in the same subnet for potential lateral movement.

4. Review Cloud Infrastructure: Confirm OVH-hosted resources are properly secured, especially given the cloud compute role.

---

Summary: While the IP itself is not malicious, its association with a high-risk subnet and geolocation inconsistencies warrant closer scrutiny. SOC teams should focus on subnet-level analysis and validate DNS/infrastructure configurations.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada
RegionQC
CitySingapore
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude45.51
Longitude-73.59

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059697
CIDR Block51.222.168.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactโ€”

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca018-san14.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca018-san14.ahrefs.net

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting โ€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
26%
24
routing
13%
11
services
12%
22
ownership
15%
22
reputation
28%
13
geolocation
32%
23
Overall21%1015
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) โ€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
โš  Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:04:26 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-27 06:50:15 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-28 00:55:59 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types21
Total Observations28
๐Ÿ” 21 signal types ยท 28 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.