IPDebrief

51.222.168.95

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 51.222.168.95/32

## Executive Summary

IP 51.222.168.95 is hosted on OVH cloud infrastructure and resolves to the ahrefs.net domain with PTR proxy-ca018-san95.ahrefs.net. The IP presents a Moderate Risk profile (Risk Score: 40) with elevated contextual threat indicators from subnet abuse density and blacklist listings. Recommended action: Monitor with selective blocking pending correlation with active threat events.

---

## Network Ownership & Infrastructure

AttributeValue
**Organization**Dmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
**ASN**16276
**Network**51.222.168.0/24
**Provider**OVH
**Infrastructure Type**CloudCompute / Hosting
**Registration**RIR: ARIN

---

## Geolocation & Validation

AttributeValue
**Reported Country**Canada (CA)
**Reported Region**Quebec
**Reported City**Singapore
**Validation Status****FAILED**
**Distance Discrepancy**5,598 km with RTT violation
**Minimum Possible RTT**112ms
**Observed RTT**23ms

*Note: Geographic data indicates location spoofing or misconfiguration. IP appears to be resolving to Singapore despite CA attribution.*

---

## Threat Indicators

IndicatorStatus
**DNSBL Listings**8 lists, 1 active listing
**Max Severity**High
**Known Attacker**No
**Tor Exit Node**No
**Spam Source**No
**Campaign Activity**None detected
**Threat Feeds**Empty

The IP has been listed on 8 DNS blacklist sources with 1 active listing of high severity. No specific threat indicators or campaign associations detected.

---

## Subnet Context (51.222.168.0/24)

MetricValue
**Abuse Density**0.8203 (High Abuse)
**Total Siblings**256
**Active Siblings**227
**Threat Siblings**210
**Subnet Classification**high_abuse

The /24 subnet exhibits high abuse density with 210 of 227 active siblings classified as threats. This contextual evidence warrants heightened monitoring despite the target IP's moderate standalone risk score.

---

## Network Services

ServiceStatus
**Open Ports**None detected
**HTTP Services**None detected
**TLS Certificates**None detected
**DNS Resolution**Forward confirmed to proxy-ca018-san95.ahrefs.net
**Email Auth**SPF/DMARC not configured

No active services detected on the IP. The reverse DNS record indicates proxy infrastructure rather than direct web hosting.

---

## Observation History

Total Observations: 21

Key temporal signals:

No evidence of increasing threat persistence or emerging attack patterns.

---

## Recommended Actions

Immediate Mitigation

PlatformRule
**iptables**`iptables -A INPUT -s 51.222.168.95 -j DROP`
**nftables**`nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 51.222.168.95 drop`
**nginx**`deny 51.222.168.95;`
**pfSense**`51.222.168.95/32`
**Cloudflare WAF**Block IP with filter: `ip.src eq 51.222.168.95`
**AWS WAF**Add address `51.222.168.95/32` to block list

Strategic Recommendations

1. Block at perimeter given subnet abuse density and DNSBL listings

2. Monitor related IPs in 51.222.168.0/24 subnet for coordinated activity

3. Correlate with threat intelligence feeds for active campaign participation

4. Review email authentication records for any spoofing attempts from ahrefs.net subdomains

---

## Intelligence Assessment

This IP presents a contextual threat rather than active malicious behavior. The combination of:

...suggests compromised or misconfigured infrastructure within OVH's cloud environment. The ahrefs.net domain association indicates potential abuse of legitimate hosting infrastructure.

Threat Level: Moderate (40/100) with contextual escalation factors

Recommended Stance: Block at perimeter, monitor for activity, correlate with broader threat landscape

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada
RegionQC
CitySingapore
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude45.51
Longitude-73.59

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059697
CIDR Block51.222.168.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactโ€”

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca018-san95.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca018-san95.ahrefs.net

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting โ€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
40%
23
routing
13%
11
services
15%
22
ownership
15%
22
reputation
23%
12
geolocation
34%
23
Overall23%1013
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) โ€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
โš  Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-24 00:33:08 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-28 23:28:33 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-29 05:30:14 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types20
Total Observations21
๐Ÿ” 20 signal types ยท 21 observations collected
This report is generated from 20+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.