IPDebrief

51.222.95.251

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING

Target: 51.222.95.251/32

Date: 2026-06-20

Classification: Moderate Risk - Cloud Infrastructure

---

## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 51.222.95.251 presents a moderate-risk profile (risk score: 40/100) operating within an OVH Cloud hosting infrastructure. The IP resolves to ahrefs.net and demonstrates geographic inconsistencies between registered data (Canada) and geolocation signals. The subnet exhibits elevated abuse density (0.7344), requiring enhanced monitoring.

---

## OWNERSHIP & INFRASTRUCTURE

AttributeValue
ASN16276
OrganizationOVH-CUST-281059689 (Dmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd)
ProviderOVH (Cloud Compute/Hosting)
CIDR Block51.222.95.0/24
Infrastructure TypeCloud Hosting
Connection TypeFirewalled / No Services

The IP is assigned to OVH cloud infrastructure. The hostname `proxy-ca010-san251.ahrefs.net` indicates association with the SEO analytics platform ahrefs.net, though no active web services are detected on this specific address.

---

## GEOLOCATION ANALYSIS

Registered Location: Canada (CA)

Reported City: Singapore (data inconsistency noted)

Accuracy Radius: 3,000 km

GeoConsensus: True (1 source)

Geographic data shows significant variance with a 3,000 km accuracy radius, suggesting either misconfigured geolocation databases or actual deployment across multiple regions. The large error margin warrants cautious interpretation.

---

## THREAT INDICATORS

IndicatorStatus
Risk Score40 (Moderate)
Abuse ConfidenceNot scored
Known AttackerNo
Spam SourceNo
Tor Exit NodeNo
Proxy ServiceNo
DNSBL Listings1 of 8 total lists
Blacklist Count0

Observation History:

---

## SUBNET CONTEXT (51.222.95.0/24)

MetricValue
Classificationhigh_abuse
Abuse Density0.7344
Total Siblings256
Active Siblings234
Threat Siblings188
Risk Distribution (Sampled)100 medium, 0 high, 0 low

The /24 subnet demonstrates elevated abuse activity. Of 100 sampled neighbors, all showed medium risk scores (40-50), with no high-risk endpoints identified in the immediate neighborhood.

---

## NETWORK RELATIONSHIPS

---

## SERVICE & PORT ANALYSIS

The IP presents as a firewalled endpoint with no active services exposed.

---

## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

1. Monitor for Service Activation: IP shows no active services but should be monitored for port opens or service changes.

2. Subnet-Level Monitoring: Given the high abuse density (0.7344) of the /24 subnet, apply broader monitoring to adjacent IPs.

3. Geographic Verification: The Canada/Singapore geolocation inconsistency warrants additional validation before deployment in geo-restricted contexts.

4. DNSBL Review: Single DNSBL listing detected; verify specific listing and assess impact on reputation.

5. Standard Cloud Infrastructure Handling: Treat as legitimate cloud hosting with moderate risk profileβ€”no immediate blocking required unless specific threat activity is observed.

---

Status: Active Monitoring Recommended

Confidence Level: Moderate

Last Updated: 2026-06-20

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Canada
RegionQC
CitySingapore
Timezoneβ€”
Latitude45.51
Longitude-73.59

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059689
CIDR Block51.222.95.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactβ€”

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca010-san251.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca010-san251.ahrefs.net

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting β€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
29%
24
routing
13%
11
services
12%
22
ownership
19%
22
reputation
31%
13
geolocation
25%
22
Overall21%1014
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-21 14:57:58 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-28 14:26:45 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-29 02:30:37 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types21
Total Observations24
πŸ” 21 signal types Β· 24 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.