IPDebrief

51.89.129.107

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

Threat Intelligence Briefing: IP 51.89.129.107/32

Overview

Observation History

- Stable network role (no changes).

- Geolocation consistency with London, UK.

- No spikes in threat signals or scan activity.

Relationships

Neighborhood Analysis

Actionable Insights

1. Monitor Subnet: The /24 subnet has mixed risk; investigate neighbors for anomalies.

2. Verify DNS: Confirm `proxy-uk008-san107.ahrefs.net` is legitimate, as it’s a critical link.

3. Firewall Rules: No immediate restrictions needed, but consider rate-limiting if unusual traffic emerges.

4. Contextualize: Ahrefs is a legitimate hosting provider, but proxy IPs may mask trafficβ€”monitor for unexpected behavior.

Conclusion

This IP is part of a legitimate hosting infrastructure with no direct malicious activity. However, its association with a proxy and the subnet’s moderate abuse density suggest vigilance. SOC teams should focus on monitoring the subnet for lateral movements or unexpected traffic patterns.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ United Kingdom
RegionENG
CityLondon
TimezoneEurope/London
Latitude51.51
Longitude-0.13

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationAhrefs Pte Ltd Dmytro
ASNAS16276
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRARIN
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-uk008-san107.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-uk008-san107.ahrefs.net

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting β€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
33%
24
routing
13%
11
services
12%
22
ownership
24%
23
reputation
31%
13
geolocation
33%
23
Overall24%1016
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-18 09:25:05 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-28 07:16:08 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-29 01:22:03 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types22
Total Observations26
πŸ” 22 signal types Β· 26 observations collected
This report is generated from 22+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.