51.89.15.48📋 Copy

# IP Intelligence Briefing: 51.89.15.48

## Executive Summary

IP 51.89.15.48 was classified as Moderate Risk (risk score: 65) with no active threat indicators. The address operates within OVH cloud infrastructure (AS16276) and is associated with hosting services. While listed on 3 of 8 DNSBLs, the IP shows no persistent malicious behavior and no active threat indicators.

## Infrastructure Profile

• ASN: 16276 (OVH SAS)
• Organization: GIL LEONARDO LUIS ANGEL
• Geolocation: US-NY (New York) per primary consensus; historical probes indicated NL and GB locations
• Network Classification: Cloud Compute, Hosting infrastructure (isCloud: true, isHosting: true)
• DNS: ip48.ip-51-89-15.eu (forward confirmed)
• Services: No open ports detected; no TLS certificates, HTTP services, or banner data

## Risk Indicators

• Risk Score: 65 (Moderate Risk)
• DNSBL Listings: 3 of 8 lists
• Operator Score: 0.2609 (Basic)
• Abuse Confidence: Not applicable
• Tor/Proxy: Not Tor exit node, not a proxy, not a CDN
• Threat Feeds: No active threat indicators detected

## Historical Observations

Fifteen observations were recorded. Geolocation data showed inconsistent reporting across probes:

• Recent observations: US-NY (Comcast transit), NL (callao1 Callao), GB (London)
• One alienvault-otx signal flagged threats from London, GB source
• No persistent malicious behavior observed (threatPersistenceDays: 0)
• No campaign correlation identified

## Network Context

• Subnet: 51.89.15.0/24
• Abuse Density: 0 (low)
• Neighbors: 1 sibling IP (51.89.15.49) with no risk score data
• Stability: Low (stabilityScore: 0); route stability flagged as false

## Relationships

• DNS Association: ip48.ip-51-89-15.eu
• Network Association: OVH_521831292

## Recommendations

The IP presents moderate risk primarily due to DNSBL listings and inconsistent geolocation data. Recommended actions include:

• Monitor for service activation (currently no open ports)
• Review DNSBL listing sources for potential false positives
• No immediate blocking required; maintain passive monitoring
• Consider geo-fencing based on primary US-NY location if applicable

*Intelligence compiled from IPDebrief platform data.*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.