Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 52.161.74.195
*Generated via IPDebrief analysis tools*
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 25 (Low Risk)
- Network Role: Microsoft Azure CloudCompute (firewalled, no services exposed)
- Geolocation: Boston, MA, US (plausible, no precise coordinates)
- Ownership: Unattributed (no ASN/org details)
- Threat Indicators: None detected (no malware, spam, or attack campaigns)
---
**2. Observation History**
- Recent Activity:
- DNSSEC validation confirmed (no spoofing detected).
- BGP prefix `52.160.0.0/11` linked to Microsoft (ASN 8075).
- DNSBL listing observed (1/8 total lists, low severity).
- Trend: No persistent malicious behavior; risk score stable.
---
**3. Relationships**
- Connected Entities: No relationships or subnets linked (empty graph).
- Certificates/Services: No TLS certs, open ports, or HTTP services detected.
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: `52.161.74.195/24`
- Neighbor Risk:
- 2 IPs in subnet:
- 52.161.74.194: Risk 25 (same as target).
- 52.161.74.196: Risk 0 (low risk).
- Abuse Density: 0% (subnet appears benign).
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Monitoring: Track DNSBL re-listings or changes in BGP routing.
- Ownership Clarification: Investigate unattributed ownership (potential misconfiguration).
- Cloud Context: Confirm Azure VM activity; no immediate mitigation needed.
Conclusion: Legitimate Microsoft Azure infrastructure with no active threats. Monitor for unusual network behavior or ownership changes.
---
*Generated by IPDebrief threat intelligence platform.*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Microsoft Corporation |
| ASN | AS8075 |
| Network Name | MSFT |
| CIDR Block | 52.145.0.0/16 |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | United States |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 24% | 2 | 2 |
| routing | 17% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 17% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 35% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 17% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 17% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 21% | 8 | 10 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-06-14 17:37:23 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-21 22:24:54 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-21 23:15:30 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 17 |
| Total Observations | 19 |
π 17 signal types Β· 19 observations collected
This report is generated from 17+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.