Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 52.165.198.204
Date: 2026-06-14
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: 25 (Low Risk)
- Owner: Microsoft Corporation (AS8075)
- Geolocation: Des Moines, IA, US (inferred via multi-signal geolocation).
- Network Role: Microsoft Azure cloud infrastructure (firewalled, no exposed services).
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (zero threat feeds, DNS, or campaign associations).
---
**2. Historical Observations**
- Last Seen: 2026-06-14 (1 day old).
- Observation Count: 1 (no persistent threats).
- Trend: No significant changes in risk or network behavior over time.
---
**3. Network Relationships**
- Linked Entities:
- Directly tied to Microsoft Azure infrastructure (AS8075).
- No connections to known malicious organizations, domains, or subnets.
- DNS/Services: No open ports, TLS certs, or HTTP services detected.
---
**4. Subnet Analysis**
- Subnet: 52.165.198.0/24
- Abuse Density: 1 (low risk, but higher than the IPβs own score).
- Neighbors: No neighboring IPs found in the subnet (likely due to sparse data or private network configuration).
---
**5. Anomalies & Flags**
- Geolocation Discrepancy: Inferred location (Des Moines, IA) conflicts with RTT (round-trip time) expectations for 7,066 km. This may indicate routing anomalies or misconfigured geolocation data.
- Subnet Risk: Despite the IPβs low risk, the subnetβs abuse density suggests potential for network-wide threats. Monitor for lateral movement or compromised siblings.
---
**6. Recommendations**
- No Immediate Action: The IP is associated with Microsoft Azure and shows no malicious activity.
- Monitor Subnet: Track the 52.165.198.0/24 subnet for unexpected changes, as abuse density is higher than the IPβs individual risk.
- Verify Geolocation: Investigate the geolocation discrepancy to rule out routing or data errors.
Conclusion: 52.165.198.204 is a low-risk Microsoft Azure IP with no direct threats. Focus on subnet-level monitoring due to conflicting geolocation data and subnet abuse density.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Microsoft Corporation |
| ASN | AS8075 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 40% | 2 | 5 |
| routing | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 12% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 28% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 35% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 24% | 10 | 17 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) β 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Low (35%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
β Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:04:27 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-27 07:34:48 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-28 01:41:38 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 20 |
| Total Observations | 25 |
π 20 signal types Β· 25 observations collected
This report is generated from 20+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.