Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 52.225.29.6
*Generated via IPDebrief Analysis*
---
1. Core Profile
- Risk Score: Low (25/100)
- Ownership: Microsoft Corporation (ASN 8075, MSFT)
- Geolocation: Registered to Boston, MA (US), but observed in San Francisco, CA (geo plausibility: questionable)
- Network Role: Microsoft Azure cloud infrastructure (firewalled, no public services)
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity, spam, or known attacker associations
2. Observation History
- Latest Signals (June 16, 2026):
- Geolocation inferred via multi-signal inference (San Francisco, CA).
- Confirmed as Microsoft Azure infrastructure.
- DNSSEC valid, no DNSBL listings.
- Trend: No persistent threats or network instability detected.
3. Relationships
- Linked to MSFT network (same ASN, infrastructure).
- No correlated malicious IPs or campaigns.
4. Neighborhood Analysis
- Subnet 52.224.0.0/11: Zero abuse density, no malicious neighbors.
- Microsoftβs Azure infrastructure is isolated and secure.
---
5. Recommendations
- Monitor: Track geolocation discrepancies (Boston vs. San Francisco) for potential misconfigurations or spoofing.
- No Action Required: No immediate threat detected; IP is legitimate Microsoft infrastructure.
- Verify: Confirm if the IPβs geolocation anomalies are due to Azureβs global infrastructure or misattribution.
Conclusion: 52.225.29.6 is a low-risk, legitimate Microsoft Azure resource with no malicious activity. Use geo-validation tools to resolve the plausibility discrepancy.
*Generated by IPDebrief β Threat Intelligence for SOC Analysts*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Microsoft Corporation |
| ASN | AS8075 |
| Network Name | MSFT |
| CIDR Block | 52.224.0.0/11 |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | United States |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 35% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 17% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 24% | 2 | 2 |
| ownership | 35% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 17% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 17% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 24% | 9 | 12 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-06-09 20:27:53 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-21 16:51:46 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-21 17:02:30 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 18 |
| Total Observations | 20 |
π 18 signal types Β· 20 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.