IPDebrief

52.232.19.79

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 52.232.19.79

Date: 2026-06-14

---

**1. Core Profile**

- Primary: Amsterdam, Netherlands (52.37°N, 4.9°E)

- Observed signal inconsistency: U.S. location (39.83°N, -98.58°W) with 35% confidence.

---

**2. Observation History**

- Geolocation: Mixed results (Netherlands vs. U.S.).

- Network Type: Confirmed Microsoft Azure cloud server (non-residential, non-VPN).

- DNSBL Listings: 4 out of 8 DNSBLs (low abuse confidence).

---

**3. Relationships**

- Same network: Microsoft Azure (MSFT) infrastructure.

- TLS certificate issuer: Sectigo (CN=Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36).

- Hosted domain: `inovasj.com` (HTTP redirect detected).

---

**4. Neighborhood Analysis**

---

**5. Technical Context**

- Open ports: 80 (HTTP), 443 (HTTPS), 22 (SSH).

- Server banner: Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu).

- TLS certificate: Valid (subject: `inovasj.com`, issuer: Sectigo).

- BGP prefix: 52.224.0.0/11 (Microsoft).

- Route stability: Stable (no recent changes).

- DNSSEC: Validated.

---

**6. SOC Recommendations**

Conclusion: This IP is a legitimate Microsoft Azure cloud server with no active threat indicators. The observed geolocation inconsistency and DNSBL listings warrant further verification but do not indicate immediate risk.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡³πŸ‡± Netherlands
RegionNH
CityAmsterdam
TimezoneEurope/Amsterdam
Latitude52.37
Longitude4.90

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationMicrosoft Corporation
ASNAS8075
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRARIN
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFPresent
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeWeb Server
Network TierHosting β€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
80httptcpβ€”
443httpstcpβ€”
22sshtcp
Closed Ports25, 3389, 8080, 8443 (3 open / 7 scanned)
ServerApache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu)
HTTP Titleβ€”
SSH VersionSSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4ubuntu0.7

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
CN=inovasj.com
Issued by CN=Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36, O=Sectigo Limited, C=GB
Self-signed: No
SANsinovasj.comwww.inovasj.com
Valid From2025-09-09T00:00:00+00:00
Valid Until2026-10-10T23:59:59+00:00
TLS ProtocolTls13
Cipher SuiteTLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Signature Algorithmsha256RSA
Validity Period396 days
Serial Number0089248FEEC4CD09FD3E9E9A9CF54C9666
Thumbprint4A6B4C4550AC32820417FFF6B01BD5DA032EDEB8

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
43%
26
routing
8%
11
services
30%
23
ownership
24%
23
reputation
26%
13
geolocation
30%
23
Overall27%1019
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:04:27 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-27 07:40:29 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-28 01:47:19 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types21
Total Observations28
πŸ” 21 signal types Β· 28 observations collected
This report is generated from 21+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.