IPDebrief

54.39.203.62

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

# THREAT INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING

Target: 54.39.203.62/32

Date: 2026-06-15

Classification: Moderate Risk / High-Abuse Infrastructure

---

## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 54.39.203.62 is a cloud hosting endpoint operating within OVH infrastructure. The address resolves to a DNS hostname associated with Ahrefs (proxy-ca008-san62.ahrefs.net), indicating potential legitimate SEO/marketing tool usage. However, the subnet demonstrates elevated abuse characteristics with 64.84% abuse density. No active threat indicators were identified, but the high-abuse neighborhood warrants defensive monitoring.

---

## INFRASTRUCTURE PROFILE

Network Ownership:

Geolocation:

Network Classification:

---

## NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS

Subnet Risk Assessment (54.39.203.0/24):

Risk Distribution:

Key Finding: The /24 subnet exhibits concentrated abuse activity with approximately 65% of sibling IPs classified as threat siblings. This indicates compromised or malicious co-tenancy within the OVH infrastructure.

---

## OBSERVATION HISTORY

Signal Count: 25 observations (2026-06-15)

Recent Signals:

1. Subnet Classification (21:02 UTC): High-abuse classification with 0.6484 abuse density, confidence 0.75

2. Geolocation Validation (20:58 UTC): RTT violation detectedβ€”29ms measured vs. 112.6ms minimum expected for claimed distance, confidence 0.30

3. Operator Score (20:56 UTC): 0.4783 (Basic), confidence 0.85

4. Geolocation (20:54 UTC): ASN AS16276 OVH SAS, Beauharnois, QC, confidence 0.50

Temporal Analysis:

---

## RELATIONSHIP GRAPH

Primary Relationships (44 total):

---

## THREAT INDICATORS

Direct Indicators:

Threat Feeds: Empty

---

## RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Defense Posture:

1. Monitor Traffic Patterns: Despite moderate individual risk score, the high-abuse subnet warrants traffic analysis for anomalies

2. Implement Rate Limiting: Apply connection rate limits to prevent exploitation of shared infrastructure

3. DNS Validation: Verify hostname (proxy-ca008-san62.ahrefs.net) resolves to expected infrastructure before allowing traffic

4. Geo-Filtering: Consider geographic restrictions if legitimate business requires specific Canadian endpoint access

Firewall Rule (Recommended):

```

# Block or restrict based on subnet-level abuse

ip addr 54.39.203.0/24

```

---

## ANALYST NOTES

This IP represents legitimate cloud infrastructure with Ahrefs branding but operates within a high-abuse OVH subnet. The 166 threat siblings in the /24 indicate significant co-tenancy with compromised hosts. While this specific IP shows no active threat indicators, the neighborhood risk suggests implementing defensive controls at the subnet level is prudent. Geographic inconsistencies require validation before trusting location-based security policies.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Canada
RegionQC
CityBeauharnois
Timezoneβ€”
Latitude45.32
Longitude-73.87

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationDmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd
ASNAS16276
Network NameOVH-CUST-281059687
CIDR Block54.39.203.0/24
RIRARIN
CountrySingapore
Abuse Contactβ€”

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTRproxy-ca008-san62.ahrefs.net
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)
Forward Hostnamesproxy-ca008-san62.ahrefs.net

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score40% (Fair)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAAPresent

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureInfrastructure / Datacenter
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierHosting β€” Infrastructure provider without advanced routing
CloudHosting

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
40%
23
routing
20%
23
services
15%
22
ownership
26%
33
reputation
23%
12
geolocation
34%
23
Overall26%1216
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceMostly Consistent (80%) β€” 1 contradiction(s)
AttributionLow (35%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid
⚠ Claimed geolocation contradicts RTT physics measurement

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-23 18:30:54 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-28 23:01:57 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-29 05:05:16 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types25
Total Observations27
πŸ” 25 signal types Β· 27 observations collected
This report is generated from 25+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.