54.39.89.32📋 Copy

IP Intelligence Briefing: 54.39.89.32

Date: 2026-06-18

---

**1. Core Risk Profile**

• Risk Score: 40 (Moderate Risk)
• Ownership: Owned by OVH (ASN 16276) under Dmytro, Ahrefs Pte Ltd.
• Geolocation: Canada (QC, Beauharnois).
• Network Role: CloudCompute infrastructure (OVH-hosted).
• Threat Indicators: No direct malicious activity detected (no blacklists, campaigns, or open ports).

---

**2. Historical Observations**

• Observation Count: 21 (last 30 days).
• Key Trends:

- Minimal risk score (0.2174) over time.

- Geolocation consistency (CA, QC) with 3000km accuracy radius.

- No significant changes in threat signals or network behavior.

• Geo Plausibility: False (potential location spoofing or misattribution).

---

**3. Network Relationships**

• Subnet: 54.39.89.32/24.
• Key Relationships:

- Linked to OVH-CUST-281059691 (same ASN).

- DNS resolves to proxy-ca012-san32.ahrefs.net (Ahrefs, legitimate).

- No direct ties to known malicious domains or organizations.

---

**4. Subnet Neighborhood Analysis**

• Subnet Abuse Density: 61.33% (high abuse).
• Neighbor Risk: 100 neighbors in /24 subnet, all rated medium/high risk.
• Threat Siblings: 157 of 256 IPs in subnet flagged as risky.
• Inherited Risk: 24 points from subnet context.

---

**5. Critical Findings & Recommendations**

• High Subnet Risk: The IP resides in a subnet with 61% abuse density, indicating potential compromise or malicious activity in the broader network.
• CloudCompute Vulnerability: As a cloud-hosted IP, it may represent a virtual machine or container that could be targeted or used for lateral movement.
• DNS & Geolocation Anomalies:

- PTR record points to a legitimate Ahrefs hostname, but geo plausibility is false, suggesting possible spoofing or misconfiguration.

- Monitor for DNS-based attacks (e.g., CNAME hijacking).

• Actionable Steps:

- Block the subnet (54.39.89.0/24) temporarily to mitigate potential lateral spread.

- Verify Ahrefs' DNS configuration to ensure no abuse.

- Investigate OVH's network for compromised instances.

---

Conclusion: While the IP itself shows no direct malicious activity, its placement in a high-risk subnet and cloud infrastructure warrants close monitoring. SOC teams should prioritize subnet-level analysis and collaboration with OVH to identify and isolate compromised assets.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.