IPDebrief

60.212.0.13

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON ๐Ÿ”ง Full Actions API
๐Ÿค– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING: 60.212.0.13/32

Classification: HIGH RISK โ€“ Immediate Review Recommended

---

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

IP 60.212.0.13 presents a HIGH RISK profile (Risk Score: 80/100) with evidence of active blacklist listings and mobile carrier association. The IP is assigned to ChinaUnicom (AS4837) infrastructure in Shandong, China, and is currently classified with firewalled/no active services. Immediate monitoring and defensive controls are recommended.

---

OWNERSHIP & INFRASTRUCTURE

---

RISK INDICATORS

---

THREAT OBSERVATIONS

---

NETWORK NEIGHBORHOOD (60.212.0.13/24)

---

RELATIONSHIP ANALYSIS

---

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

IMMEDIATE:

1. Firewall Rule Deployment: Block inbound traffic from 60.212.0.13/32

- iptables: `iptables -A INPUT -s 60.212.0.13 -j DROP`

- nftables: `nft add rule inet filter input ip saddr 60.212.0.13 drop`

- Cloudflare WAF: Block with expression `ip.src eq 60.212.0.13`

- AWS WAF: Add to allowlist deny list `60.212.0.13/32`

2. Enhanced Logging: Increase verbosity for all traffic involving this IP address. Monitor for connection attempts and scan activity.

3. Correlation Check: Review all traffic from 60.212.0.0.0/16 subnet for coordinated activity patterns.

---

THREAT CONTEXT

The IP's high risk score correlates with multiple blacklist listings detected in recent observations. The mobile carrier classification suggests the IP may be used for mobile device communication or IoT devices. The absence of open services indicates either passive scanning or active firewall blocking.

---

MONITORING PRIORITY: CRITICAL

Last Updated: Current briefing based on latest available intelligence

*Recommendations are probabilistic and should be validated against internal threat intelligence before enforcement.*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

๐ŸŒ Geolocation

Country๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China
RegionShandong
CityQingdao
Timezoneโ€”
Latitude36.06
Longitude120.38

๐Ÿข Ownership & Registration

OrganizationChinaUnicom Hostmaster
ASNAS4837
Network NameUNICOM-SD
CIDR Block60.216.0.0/15
RIRAPNIC
CountryCN
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

๐ŸŒ DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo โ€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

๐Ÿ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

โ˜๏ธ Network Classification

InfrastructureMobile
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown โ€” Insufficient routing data to classify
Mobile

๐Ÿ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverโ€”
HTTP Titleโ€”

๐Ÿ” TLS Certificate

๐Ÿ”’
No certificate
Issued by โ€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromโ€”
Valid Untilโ€”

๐ŸŽฏ Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
30%
23
routing
13%
11
services
18%
22
ownership
27%
23
reputation
26%
13
geolocation
19%
22
Overall22%1014
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions ยท Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

๐Ÿ“… Observation Timeline ๐Ÿ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-07 23:04:30 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-26 18:11:29 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-23 19:22:17 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types16
Total Observations17
๐Ÿ” 16 signal types ยท 17 observations collected
This report is generated from 16+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API ๐Ÿ”ง Actions API ๐Ÿ“ง Enterprise Access

โ„น๏ธ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata โ€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.