62.216.215.105
IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
🤖 Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 62.216.215.105
*Generated via IPDebrief analysis*
---
**1. Core Profile**
- Risk Score: Low Risk (0/100)
- Geolocation: Munich, Bavaria, Germany (48.13°N, 11.57°E)
- Network: Owned by MNET-MNT (RIPE) as MNET-NAT
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity detected (no blacklists, campaigns, or TLS anomalies)
- Network Role: Unallocated / Firewalled (no open ports, services, or HTTP banners)
- DNS: No public DNS records or domain associations; DNSSEC and CAA records present
---
**2. Observation History**
- Stability: Consistent geolocation (Munich, Germany) since 2026-05-21
- Operator Score: Minimal (0.2174)
- Threat Trends: No persistent malicious activity; zero threat observations in 30 days
- DNS Behavior: Multiple failed DNS queries to private IPs (192.168.2.108), suggesting misconfigured DNS or internal network testing
---
**3. Relationships**
- Network Affiliation: Linked to MNET-NAT (same network as 62.216.210.0/23)
- DNS Associations: Failed queries to internal IPs (192.168.2.108)
- No External Threat Links: No connections to known malicious domains, subnets, or campaigns
---
**4. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 62.216.215.0/24
- Neighbor Risk:
- 62.216.215.69: Medium Risk (40/100)
- 62.216.215.221: Medium Risk (40/100)
- Subnet Abuse Density: 0% (no malicious activity detected in neighbors)
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Monitor DNS Configuration: Investigate failed DNS queries to 192.168.2.108 (internal IP) for potential misconfigurations or network testing.
- Subnet Surveillance: Track neighbors (62.216.215.69/221) for emerging threats despite current low risk.
- Verify Network Segmentation: Ensure internal IPs (e.g., 192.168.2.108) are isolated from public-facing systems.
- Baseline Activity: No immediate action required for 62.216.215.105, but maintain monitoring for anomalies.
---
Note: This IP appears benign, but the DNS anomalies warrant further investigation.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | MNET-MNT |
| ASN | AS8767 |
| Network Name | — |
| CIDR Block | — |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | — |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR | aftr-62-216-215-105.dynamic.mnet-online.de |
| Forward Confirmed | Yes — FCrDNS verified |
| Forward Hostnames | aftr-62-216-215-105.dynamic.mnet-online.de |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 100% (Excellent) |
| SPF | Present |
| DMARC | Present |
| FCrDNS | Verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by —
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| geolocation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 13% | 6 | 7 |
Coverage: 5/6 dimensions · Data sufficiency: partial
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (70%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-17 21:15:58 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-08 10:08:41 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-08 10:37:41 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 20 |
| Total Observations | 21 |
🔍 20 signal types · 21 observations collected
This report is generated from 20+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
ℹ️ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata — IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.