64.52.19.90
IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
🤖 Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 64.52.19.90/32
*Generated via IPDebrief Analysis*
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Overall Risk Score: Low (25/100)
- Provider/Authority Scores: 0/100 (No provider association detected)
- Threat Indicators: No known malware, spam, or attacker associations.
- Network Classification: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports or TLS services detected).
---
**2. Ownership & Geolocation**
- ASN: 396982 (Intruder)
- Country: United Kingdom (GB)
- Geolocation: Inferred via multi-signal inference (latitude: 55.38, longitude: -3.44, ±500km). ICMP validation failed, suggesting potential spoofing or restrictive firewall rules.
---
**3. Threat & Behavioral Observations**
- Historical Signals:
- 16 observations over time, primarily geolocation attempts.
- ICMP blocked, preventing RTT/latency validation.
- Minimal operator risk score (0.13), indicating residential or private network likelihood.
- No Malicious Activity: No DNS, TLS, or service-based threats detected.
---
**4. Network Relationships**
- Subnet: 64.52.19.0/24 (abuse density: 1, classification: "mostly_clean")
- Linked Entities:
- Repeated references to network block "UK-INTRUDER-20000306" (likely owner's infrastructure).
- No external domains, certificates, or hostnames associated.
---
**5. Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet Neighbors: 1 active sibling IP (64.52.19.135) with low risk (score: 0).
- Subnet Abuse Density: 1/100 (minimal risk).
---
**6. Actionable Insights**
- No Immediate Threat: IP shows no malicious indicators, but ownership by "Intruder" (AS 396982) warrants further investigation.
- Geolocation Anomalies: ICMP blocking suggests potential spoofing or restrictive policies; validate via alternative methods.
- Monitor Subnet: Track 64.52.19.135 for any emerging risks, as it is the only active sibling.
---
Recommendation: Low-priority monitoring. Focus on network owner (Intruder) and subnet behavior. No immediate mitigation required.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Intruder |
| ASN | AS396982 |
| Network Name | — |
| CIDR Block | — |
| RIR | ARIN |
| Country | — |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by —
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| routing | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 21% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 30% | 2 | 3 |
| Overall | 18% | 9 | 14 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions · Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:04:32 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-23 19:54:39 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-23 20:25:18 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 18 |
| Total Observations | 19 |
🔍 18 signal types · 19 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
ℹ️ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata — IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.