Your IP: 216.73.216.123
π€ Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
IP Intelligence Briefing: 79.141.173.91
Date: 2026-06-08
---
**1. Core Risk Profile**
- Risk Score: 25 (Low Risk)
- Provider: HZ-HOSTING-LTD (AS202015)
- Geolocation: Dallas, Texas, United States (32.78°N, -96.8°E)
- Network Role: Colocation Hosting (No public services detected)
- Threat Indicators: No malicious activity, spam, or known attacker associations.
---
**2. Historical Observations**
- Stability: No ownership changes or persistent threats in 30 days.
- Geolocation Consistency: Stable U.S. origin with no anomalous routing.
- Subnet Abuse Density: 0% (clean subnet).
---
**3. Network Relationships**
- Linked Entities:
- Subnet: `HZ-NA49` (79.141.173.0/24)
- Hosting Provider: HZ-HOSTING-LTD (RIPE-registered)
- No DNS or certificate relationships detected.
---
**4. Subnet Neighbors**
- Neighboring IPs:
- `79.141.173.49` (Risk Score: 55 β Medium Risk)
- Subnet Health: 1 active IP with elevated risk; 24 other IPs in the subnet are clean.
---
**5. Actionable Insights**
- Monitor Neighbor: The IP `79.141.173.49` (Medium Risk) may require further investigation.
- Verify Hosting Compliance: Ensure HZ-HOSTING-LTD adheres to security best practices for colocation.
- Traffic Filtering: Consider allowing traffic to this IP if itβs part of a legitimate hosting infrastructure.
---
Conclusion:
The IP 79.141.173.91 is currently low risk and appears to be a legitimate colocation hosting asset. However, its subnet contains one medium-risk neighbor. SOC teams should monitor the subnet for unusual activity and validate the hosting providerβs security posture.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | HZ-HOSTING-LTD |
| ASN | AS202015 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Infrastructure / Datacenter |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Hosting β Infrastructure provider without advanced routing |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
No certificate
Issued by β
N/A
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 27% | 2 | 2 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 27% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 19% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| Overall | 19% | 8 | 10 |
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
| Data Coherence | Mostly Consistent (80%) β 1 contradiction(s) |
| Attribution | Low (35%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
β Geo sources disagree on country: BG, US
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-16 08:57:42 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-07 22:03:55 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-07 22:36:40 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 17 |
| Total Observations | 18 |
π 17 signal types Β· 18 observations collected
This report is generated from 17+ independent intelligence signals including
ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds,
behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
βΉοΈ About This Report
All data shown is publicly available network metadata β IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals.
Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions.
To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.