80.94.92.206
IP Intelligence Briefing: 80.94.92.206
*Generated via IPDebrief tools (June 2026)*
---
**Risk Profile**
- Risk Score: 65 (Moderate)
- Network Classification: Firewalled / No Services
- Ownership: Registered to ABUSE DEP (RIPE) with abuse contact available via RDAP.
- Geolocation: Netherlands (NL), coordinates 52.13°N, 5.29°E.
---
**Threat Indicators**
- No direct malicious activity detected (no malware, phishing, or exploitation indicators).
- BGP Analysis:
- Subnet 80.94.92.0/24 has abuse density 0.3571 (mixed classification).
- Inherited risk: 14 (linked to high-risk neighbors).
- DNSSEC Valid: True, but no DNSBL listings.
---
**Observation History**
- Latest Observations (June 2026):
- DNSSEC validation and routing stability flagged as "Minimal" risk.
- Subnet abuse density noted as "mixed" with 10 threat siblings.
- No significant changes in threat signals over 30 days.
---
**Network Relationships**
- Linked Entities:
- Multiple relationships to DMZHOST (likely a network segment or internal host).
- No external domains, certificates, or services detected.
---
**Neighborhood Analysis**
- Subnet: 80.94.92.0/24 (30 total IPs).
- Risk Distribution:
- High-risk IPs: 80.94.92.102 (80), 80.94.92.171 (80), 80.94.92.182 (80).
- Medium-risk IPs: 80.94.92.109 (55), 80.94.92.164 (65).
- Low-risk IPs: 80.94.92.178 (0), 80.94.92.233 (25).
- Abuse Density: 26.7% of subnet IPs flagged for abuse.
---
**Actionable Insights**
1. Monitor Subnet Activity: The 80.94.92.0/24 subnet has a mixed abuse profile with multiple high-risk neighbors. Investigate potential lateral movement or network segmentation.
2. Verify DMZHOST Context: The IP’s relationships to DMZHOST suggest it may be part of an internal network. Confirm if this IP is a legitimate internal asset or a compromised host.
3. Check for Anomalies: Despite no direct threats, the inherited risk from neighbors warrants closer scrutiny, especially if this IP is accessible from external networks.
---
*End of Briefing*
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
🏢 Ownership & Registration
| Organization | ABUSE DEP |
| ASN | AS47890 |
| Network Name | — |
| CIDR Block | — |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | — |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
🌐 DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No — PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
🔐 DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 20% (Poor) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Not configured |
☁️ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Firewalled / No Services |
| Network Tier | Unknown — Insufficient routing data to classify |
🔌 Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| No open ports detected | |||
| Server | — |
| HTTP Title | — |
🔐 TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | — |
| Valid Until | — |
🎯 Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 29% | 2 | 2 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 8% | 1 | 1 |
| ownership | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 17% | 1 | 2 |
| geolocation | 21% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 18% | 9 | 11 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
📅 Observation Timeline 🔄 Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:04:36 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-26 08:24:08 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-23 22:24:51 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 14 |
| Total Observations | 16 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.