IP Intelligence Briefing: 81.30.98.33
Date: 2026-06-18
---
**1. Risk Profile**
- Overall Risk: Moderate (Risk Score: 40)
- Threat Indicators: No direct malicious activity detected; no known campaigns, spam, or Tor exit nodes.
- Network Role: Firewalled / No Services (no open ports, no TLS/HTTP services).
- Ownership:
- ASN: 209425 (Abuse contact role object, RIPE registry).
- Geolocation: US (latitude/longitude unspecified, 2500km accuracy radius).
---
**2. Threat History**
- Observed 1 time in June 2026:
- Signal Type: Threat intelligence (pulse count: 21).
- Sources: Alienvault-OTX.
- Risk: Moderate (linked to ASN 3320, Deutsche Telekom AG).
- No persistent malicious activity or long-term threats.
---
**3. Network Relationships**
- Subnet: 81.30.98.33/24 (abuse density: 0.455, classification: mixed).
- High-Risk Neighbors: 10 IPs with risk scores β₯ 80 (e.g., 81.30.98.44, 81.30.98.49, 81.30.98.142).
- Shared Infrastructure: Linked to networks labeled "IR-LORDVPS11-20240618" (potentially VPS/cloud services).
- Abuse Density: 45.5% of subnet IPs show abuse risk.
---
**4. Key Observations**
- Mixed Risk Subnet: 13 inherited risks from neighbors, 7 threat siblings.
- DNS/Network:
- DNSSEC valid, CAA records present.
- BGP route stability: Unstable (route changes in 30 days).
- Traffic Patterns:
- No HTTP/HTTPS services, no TLS certificates.
- Scans detected (ports scanned: 21+).
---
**5. Recommendations**
- Monitor Neighbors: High-risk IPs in the same subnet (e.g., 81.30.98.44, 81.30.98.142) may indicate shared infrastructure risks.
- Investigate Ownership: Verify ASN 209425 (Abuse contact role) for potential misconfigurations or malicious use.
- Network Segmentation: Consider isolating this subnet due to mixed risk and potential lateral movement vectors.
- Threat Feeds: Cross-check against DNSBLs (2 listed) and threat intelligence platforms for missed indicators.
---
Note: No immediate action required, but continuous monitoring is advised due to the subnetβs abuse density and linked high-risk neighbors.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.
π’ Ownership & Registration
| Organization | Abuse contact role object |
| ASN | AS209425 |
| Network Name | β |
| CIDR Block | β |
| RIR | RIPE |
| Country | β |
| Abuse Contact | Available via RDAP |
π DNS Intelligence
| PTR Record | No PTR |
| Forward Confirmed | No β PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal) |
π DNS Hygiene
| Hygiene Score | 40% (Fair) |
| SPF | Not configured |
| DMARC | Not configured |
| FCrDNS | Not verified |
| DNSSEC | Valid |
| CAA | Present |
βοΈ Network Classification
| Infrastructure | Unknown |
| Service Purpose | Single-Service Host |
| Network Tier | Unknown β Insufficient routing data to classify |
π Services & Open Ports
| Port | Service | Protocol | Banner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3389 | rdp | tcp | β |
| Closed Ports | 22, 25, 80, 443, 8080, 8443 (1 open / 7 scanned) | ||
| Server | β |
| HTTP Title | β |
π TLS Certificate
| SANs | None |
| Valid From | β |
| Valid Until | β |
π― Confidence Breakdown
Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness
| Dimension | Score | Sources | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| threat | 24% | 2 | 4 |
| routing | 13% | 1 | 1 |
| services | 26% | 2 | 3 |
| ownership | 20% | 2 | 3 |
| reputation | 23% | 1 | 3 |
| geolocation | 21% | 2 | 2 |
| Overall | 21% | 10 | 16 |
| Data Coherence | Consistent (100%) |
| Attribution | Moderate (50%) |
| OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid |
π Observation Timeline π Live
| First Seen | 2026-05-07 23:04:36 UTC |
| Last Seen | 2026-06-23 22:27:08 UTC |
| Profile Built | 2026-06-23 22:35:11 UTC |
| Data Freshness | Live |
| Signal Types | 21 |
| Total Observations | 23 |
Full dossier details are available via our API.