84.233.251.12📋 Copy

# IPDebrief Intelligence Briefing: 84.233.251.12/32

Classification: Moderate Risk | Date: 2026-07-31 | Jurisdiction: United Kingdom (GB)

## Executive Summary

IP address 84.233.251.12 is classified as Moderate Risk (Score: 50) with no current malicious activity indicators. The address operates within a clean subnet (84.233.251.0/24) with zero abuse density and no known threat sibling IPs. No open ports or active services detected; the endpoint is fully firewalled.

---

## Ownership & Network Classification

• ASN: 212238
• Organization: AS3257-IPAM-MNT (CDNEXT-MAN)
• CIDR Block: 84.233.251.0/24
• RIR: RIPE (Europe)
• Network Type: Firewalled / No Services
• Provider Classification: Not a CDN, VPN, proxy, Tor, or hosting provider

---

## Geolocation Analysis

• Primary Location: Manchester, England, GB
• Secondary Signal: London, GB (via iata-transit pattern)
• Accuracy: 750km radius
• Geo Consensus: Confirmed (2 sources)
• RTT Path: 14 hops via Comcast/Cogent transit networks
• Status: GeoPlausible flag not set; position requires validation

---

## Threat Intelligence Assessment

---

## Neighborhood Analysis (84.233.251.0/24)

• Abuse Density: 0 (Clean subnet)
• Subnet Classification: Clean
• Total Siblings: 2
• Active Siblings: 1
• Threat Siblings: 0
• Adjacent IP: 84.233.251.14 (Risk Score: 25, Authority Score: 50)

---

## DNS Analysis

• PTR Hostname: unn-84-233-251-12.datapacket.com
• Forward Resolution: 1 record
• DNSSEC Valid: Yes
• Hosted Domains: 0

---

## Control Plane Status

• Route Stability: Unstable (isRouteStable: false)
• Route Changes (30d): 0
• RPKI State: Not assessed
• IRR Consistency: Not assessed
• Delegation Age: Not assessed

---

## Historical Signals (16 observations)

Recent observations (2026-07-31) indicate:

• Ownership signals from AS3257-IPAM-MNT (confidence: 0.90)
• Geolocation signals from GB/London area (confidence: 0.85)
• Traceroute completion with 14 hops
• No persistent malicious activity detected

---

## Recommended Actions

Risk Score: 50 (Moderate)

While no direct threats were identified, the following defensive controls are recommended:

---

## Intelligence Notes

1. Clean Subnet Context: The immediate neighborhood shows no abuse patterns; the single active sibling (84.233.251.14) presents minimal risk.

2. No Active Services: The IP is fully firewalled with no open ports, reducing direct exploitation vectors.

3. DNSBL Presence: The IP appears on 2 out of 8 DNSBL lists—requires investigation of specific list reasons if blocking occurs.

4. Route Instability: The BGP prefix shows instability flags; monitor for potential route hijacking or misconfiguration.

5. Geolocation Discrepancy: Signals indicate both Manchester and London locations; validate actual endpoint location if relevant to threat hunting.

Recommendation: Monitor for service activation. No immediate threat action required, but maintain logging and periodic re-scanning given the Moderate Risk classification and DNSBL presence.

---

*Report generated via IPDebrief Intelligence Platform*

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.