IPDebrief

84.239.46.144

IP Intelligence Dossier
Your IP: 216.73.216.123
{ } JSON πŸ”§ Full Actions API
πŸ€– Witness AIThis summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

IP Intelligence Briefing: 84.239.46.144

Date: 2026-06-09

---

**1. Profile Summary**

- Tor Exit Node: Confirmed as a Tor exit relay.

- DNSSEC Valid: True.

- DNSBL Listed: 1/8 lists.

- ASN: 201308 (Castlegem SRL, Romania).

- Geolocation: Registered to UK (GB), but ISP is Romanian.

- Provider: Tor Exit Node.

- Subnet: 84.239.46.0/24.

- Abuse Density: 0 (clean).

---

**2. Observation History**

- Tor Exit Indicators: Observed 1 time in the last 30 days.

- Minimal Risk: Operator score (0.13) and stability score (0).

- No persistent malicious activity detected.

- ICMP validation failed (firewalled or restricted).

---

**3. Relationships**

- Same Network: 22 relationships to "CASTLEGEM" (Castlegem SRL, Romania).

- Subnet: 84.239.46.0/24.

- No direct links to known malicious campaigns or organizations.

---

**4. Neighborhood Analysis**

---

**5. Actionable Insights**

- Tor exit nodes are often used for anonymizing traffic but can be abused for C2, data exfiltration, or covert operations.

- The IP’s association with a Romanian ISP and UK geolocation may indicate complex routing or misconfigured infrastructure.

- Monitor Traffic: Track outbound connections from this IP for unusual patterns (e.g., encrypted traffic, C2 signatures).

- Block Tor Exit Nodes: Consider blocking all Tor relays in your network if not required.

- Verify Ownership: Confirm Castlegem SRL’s legitimacy and ensure no unauthorized use of their ASN.

---

Conclusion: This IP is a Tor exit node with no direct malicious indicators but warrants monitoring due to its anonymity layer and ownership ties. Verify if it aligns with legitimate Tor usage or if it’s being repurposed for malicious activities.

This summary was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies. Verify critical details independently.

🌍 Geolocation

CountryπŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ United Kingdom
Regionβ€”
Cityβ€”
TimezoneEurope/London
Latitude46.00
Longitude25.00

🏒 Ownership & Registration

OrganizationMNT-ADNET
ASNAS201308
Network Nameβ€”
CIDR Blockβ€”
RIRRIPE
Countryβ€”
Abuse ContactAvailable via RDAP

🌐 DNS Intelligence

PTR RecordNo PTR
Forward ConfirmedNo β€” PTR hostname does not resolve back to this IP (weak signal)

πŸ” DNS Hygiene

Hygiene Score20% (Poor)
SPFNot configured
DMARCNot configured
FCrDNSNot verified
DNSSECValid
CAANot configured

☁️ Network Classification

InfrastructureUnknown
Service PurposeFirewalled / No Services
Network TierUnknown β€” Insufficient routing data to classify
No specific classification

πŸ”Œ Services & Open Ports

PortServiceProtocolBanner
No open ports detected
Closed Ports22, 25, 80, 443, 3389, 8080, 8443 (0 open / 7 scanned)
Serverβ€”
HTTP Titleβ€”

πŸ” TLS Certificate

πŸ”’
No certificate
Issued by β€”
N/A
SANsNone
Valid Fromβ€”
Valid Untilβ€”

🎯 Confidence Breakdown

Per-dimension confidence scores based on source diversity and data freshness

DimensionScoreSourcesObservations
threat
34%
23
routing
13%
11
services
15%
22
ownership
24%
23
reputation
30%
13
geolocation
30%
23
Overall24%1015
Coverage: 6/6 dimensions Β· Data sufficiency: sufficient
Data CoherenceConsistent (100%)
AttributionModerate (50%)
OwnershipFCrDNSGeo ConsensusGeo PlausibleIRR MatchRPKI Valid

πŸ“… Observation Timeline πŸ”„ Live

First Seen2026-05-22 13:35:39 UTC
Last Seen2026-06-26 21:06:48 UTC
Profile Built2026-06-27 10:35:11 UTC
Data FreshnessLive
Signal Types18
Total Observations47
πŸ” 18 signal types Β· 47 observations collected
This report is generated from 18+ independent intelligence signals including ownership records, DNS analysis, BGP routing, TLS certificates, port scanning, threat feeds, behavioral fingerprinting, and more.
Full dossier details are available via our API.
{ } JSON API πŸ”§ Actions API πŸ“§ Enterprise Access

ℹ️ About This Report

All data shown is publicly available network metadata β€” IP addresses do not reliably identify individuals. Assessments are probabilistic and should not be used as sole basis for access control decisions. To report an issue or request data review, contact admin@ipdebrief.com.